Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1910–1993 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental Insurance
green
2 sentences1993The Appellate Division, however, granted Continental’s motion, holding that the exclusions in the $500,000 GCL policy rendered it inapplicable to the loss, and that the $1 million OCP policy could not be applied to the settlement "because any payments on behalf of the State for vicarious liability would subrogate Continental to the State’s claims against Fresh Meadows, the actual wrongdoer.” ( 185 AD2d 187, 188 .) The court also determined that, irrespective of Continental’s assertion that the OCP also contained an exclusion barring coverage of the claim, Continental had acknowledged coverage 1993The Appellate Division, however, granted Continental's motion, holding that the exclusions in the $500,000 GCL policy rendered it inapplicable to the loss, and that the $1 million OCP policy could not be applied to the settlement "because any payments on behalf of the State for vicarious liability would subrogate Continental to the State's claims against Fresh Meadows, the actual wrongdoer." ( 185 AD2d 187, 188 .) The court also determined that, irrespective of Continental's assertion that the OCP also contained an exclusion barring coverage of the claim, Continental had acknowledged coverage | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Yeshiva University v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
green
1 sentence1987The court properly found that the town’s cause of action against Continental, brought more than two years after performance was accepted and final payment was made, was therefore time barred by the contractual limitations period (see, Yeshiva Univ. v Fidelity & Deposit Co., 116 AD2d 49 , lv denied 68 NY2d 603 ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. Smart
green
1 sentence1979Co. v Smart, 267 US 126 .) Accordingly, defendant Continental’s motion is denied and plaintiff Ohio Casualty’s motion for a declaration of the rights of the parties herein is granted as set forth in this memorandum decision and defendant University of Rochester is granted summary judgment against defendant Continental in the sum of $50,000. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
In re the Arbitration between Jonathan Logan, Inc. & Stillwater Worsted Mills, Inc.
green
1 sentence1976The exhibits presented show that Continental was derelict in this regard (Matter of Jonathan Logan, Inc. [Stillwater Worsted Mills], 31 AD2d 208 , affd 24 NY2d 898 ; Matter of General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
In re the Arbitration between Jonathan Logan, Inc. & Stillwater Worsted Mills, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1976The exhibits presented show that Continental was derelict in this regard (Matter of Jonathan Logan, Inc. [Stillwater Worsted Mills], 31 AD2d 208 , affd 24 NY2d 898 ; Matter of General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Columbia v. Lee
neutral
1 sentence1974(See Columbia v. Lee, 243 App. Div. 361 .) Continental’s defense of the Statute of Frauds must fail and the plaintiff Fisk may recover the rent due under the lease with Continental for the months of April to November, 1973, a total of eight months. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Shipman v. Bank of New York
green
1 sentence1910Although at times banks have complained of the harshness of our rule, and in some instances while acting in good faith have been subjected to severe loss ( Shipman v. Bank of the State of N.Y., 126 N.Y. 318 ), as a result of this rule banks are used by all classes of our people for the deposit of funds and payment is made by check to an extent unknown elsewhere. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.