Continental motion (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

Continental motion in New York

6 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1910–1993 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental Insurance green
nyappdiv · 1992
2 sentences

1993The Appellate Division, however, granted Continental’s motion, holding that the exclusions in the $500,000 GCL policy rendered it inapplicable to the loss, and that the $1 million OCP policy could not be applied to the settlement "because any payments on behalf of the State for vicarious liability would subrogate Continental to the State’s claims against Fresh Meadows, the actual wrongdoer.” ( 185 AD2d 187, 188 .) The court also determined that, irrespective of Continental’s assertion that the OCP also contained an exclusion barring coverage of the claim, Continental had acknowledged coverage

1993The Appellate Division, however, granted Continental's motion, holding that the exclusions in the $500,000 GCL policy rendered it inapplicable to the loss, and that the $1 million OCP policy could not be applied to the settlement "because any payments on behalf of the State for vicarious liability would subrogate Continental to the State's claims against Fresh Meadows, the actual wrongdoer." ( 185 AD2d 187, 188 .) The court also determined that, irrespective of Continental's assertion that the OCP also contained an exclusion barring coverage of the claim, Continental had acknowledged coverage

11993–1993
Yeshiva University v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. green
nyappdiv · 1986
1 sentence

1987The court properly found that the town’s cause of action against Continental, brought more than two years after performance was accepted and final payment was made, was therefore time barred by the contractual limitations period (see, Yeshiva Univ. v Fidelity & Deposit Co., 116 AD2d 49 , lv denied 68 NY2d 603 ).

11987–1987
Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. Smart green
scotus · 1925
1 sentence

1979Co. v Smart, 267 US 126 .) Accordingly, defendant Continental’s motion is denied and plaintiff Ohio Casualty’s motion for a declaration of the rights of the parties herein is granted as set forth in this memorandum decision and defendant University of Rochester is granted summary judgment against defendant Continental in the sum of $50,000.

11979–1979
In re the Arbitration between Jonathan Logan, Inc. & Stillwater Worsted Mills, Inc. green
nyappdiv · 1968
1 sentence

1976The exhibits presented show that Continental was derelict in this regard (Matter of Jonathan Logan, Inc. [Stillwater Worsted Mills], 31 AD2d 208 , affd 24 NY2d 898 ; Matter of General Acc. Fire & Life Assur.

11976–1976
In re the Arbitration between Jonathan Logan, Inc. & Stillwater Worsted Mills, Inc. neutral
ny · 1969
1 sentence

1976The exhibits presented show that Continental was derelict in this regard (Matter of Jonathan Logan, Inc. [Stillwater Worsted Mills], 31 AD2d 208 , affd 24 NY2d 898 ; Matter of General Acc. Fire & Life Assur.

11976–1976
Columbia v. Lee neutral
nyappdiv · 1935
1 sentence

1974(See Columbia v. Lee, 243 App. Div. 361 .) Continental’s defense of the Statute of Frauds must fail and the plaintiff Fisk may recover the rent due under the lease with Continental for the months of April to November, 1973, a total of eight months.

11974–1974
Shipman v. Bank of New York green
· 1891
1 sentence

1910Although at times banks have complained of the harshness of our rule, and in some instances while acting in good faith have been subjected to severe loss ( Shipman v. Bank of the State of N.Y., 126 N.Y. 318 ), as a result of this rule banks are used by all classes of our people for the deposit of funds and payment is made by check to an extent unknown elsewhere.

11910–1910

Where else courts name it

IL 11 (1931–2023) OH 11 (1994–2018) TX 8 (1986–2011) LA 8 (1977–2012) CA 7 (1968–2015) NY 6 (1910–1993) FL 5 (1982–2006) WI 2 (1992–2020) WA 2 (2004–2004) UT 2 (1997–2005) MO 2 (1986–2003) CO 2 (2000–2026) ND 2 (2003–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check