Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hinton v. Fischergreen1 sentence2021The documents were redundant in light of petitioner's hearing testimony and the Hearing Officer's acceptance of the fact that petitioner had previously filed them ( see Matter of Cruz v Annucci , 149 AD3d 1446, 1447 [2017]; Matter of Hinton v Fischer , 108 AD3d 1000, 1002 [2013]). | 1 | 1 |
Cruz v. Annuccigreen1 sentence2021The documents were redundant in light of petitioner's hearing testimony and the Hearing Officer's acceptance of the fact that petitioner had previously filed them ( see Matter of Cruz v Annucci , 149 AD3d 1446, 1447 [2017]; Matter of Hinton v Fischer , 108 AD3d 1000, 1002 [2013]). | 1 | 1 |
Wigfall v. Goordgreen1 sentence2010Substantial evidence, consisting of the misbehavior report and the testimony adduced at the first disciplinary hearing, supports the determination finding petitioner guilty of creating a disturbance and making threats (see Matter of Wigfall v Goord, 53 AD3d 943, 943 [2008]; Matter of Lewis v Goord, 43 AD3d 1259 [2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 1030 [2008]). | 1 | 1 |
Britt v. Fischergreen1 sentence2010The determination finding petitioner guilty of conspiring to assault an inmate and engaging in violent conduct is supported by substantial evidence consisting not only of the misbehavior report and the testimony of its author, but also the confidential information considered by the Hearing Officer in camera (see Matter of Hill v Fischer, 69 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2010]; Matter of Britt v Fischer, 54 AD3d 1087, 1087 [2008]). | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Fischergreen1 sentence2010The determination finding petitioner guilty of conspiring to assault an inmate and engaging in violent conduct is supported by substantial evidence consisting not only of the misbehavior report and the testimony of its author, but also the confidential information considered by the Hearing Officer in camera (see Matter of Hill v Fischer, 69 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2010]; Matter of Britt v Fischer, 54 AD3d 1087, 1087 [2008]). | 1 | 1 |
Marquez v. Manngreen1 sentence2005Finally, nothing in this record required the Hearing Officer to disqualify himself from presiding over the first disciplinary hearing as the Hearing Officer was not involved in the investigation of the case (see 7 NYCRR 254.1; see also Matter of Marquez v Mann, 188 AD2d 956, 956 [1992]). | 1 | 1 |
Cayenne v. Goordgreen1 sentence2005In any event, there is no evidence that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Cayenne v Goord, 16 AD3d 782, 783-784 [2005]; Matter of Rosa v Coombe, 238 AD2d 814, 815 [1997], appeal dismissed 90 NY2d 900 [1997]). | 1 | 1 |
Rosa v. Coombegreen1 sentence2005In any event, there is no evidence that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Cayenne v Goord, 16 AD3d 782, 783-784 [2005]; Matter of Rosa v Coombe, 238 AD2d 814, 815 [1997], appeal dismissed 90 NY2d 900 [1997]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lewis v. Goord
green
1 sentence2010Substantial evidence, consisting of the misbehavior report and the testimony adduced at the first disciplinary hearing, supports the determination finding petitioner guilty of creating a disturbance and making threats (see Matter of Wigfall v Goord, 53 AD3d 943, 943 [2008]; Matter of Lewis v Goord, 43 AD3d 1259 [2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 1030 [2008]). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Johnson v. Pataki
neutral
1 sentence2005In any event, there is no evidence that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of Cayenne v Goord, 16 AD3d 782, 783-784 [2005]; Matter of Rosa v Coombe, 238 AD2d 814, 815 [1997], appeal dismissed 90 NY2d 900 [1997]). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Sowell v. Goord
green
1 sentence2003When this behavior was compounded by petitioner’s thrusting of a manual at the Hearing Officer, the decision to expel him from the hearing was entirely proper (see Matter of Sowell v Goord, 295 AD2d 835 [2002]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Best v. Leonardo
neutral
1 sentence1997Inasmuch as a second disciplinary hearing has been held, petitioner’s appeal from Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing his application for review of the outcome of the first hearing is moot (see, Matter of Best v Leonardo, 194 AD2d 1018 , appeal dismissed 82 NY2d 799 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Best v. Leonardo
neutral
1 sentence1997Inasmuch as a second disciplinary hearing has been held, petitioner’s appeal from Supreme Court’s judgment dismissing his application for review of the outcome of the first hearing is moot (see, Matter of Best v Leonardo, 194 AD2d 1018 , appeal dismissed 82 NY2d 799 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
1 sentence1976A fortiori, after petitioner’s voluntary admission of the charges, a claim that she did not receive timely formal notice of the first disciplinary hearing, as required by Wolff v McDonnell ( 418 US 539, 564 ), even if true, is irrelevant. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.