Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2021 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Alstongreen2 sentences2021This procedure violated "the one persistently protected and enunciated rule of jury selection—that the People make peremptory challenges first, and that they never be permitted to go back and challenge a juror accepted by the defense" ( People v Alston , 88 NY2d 519 , [*2]529). 2021This procedure violated "the one persistently protected and enunciated rule of jury selection—that the People make peremptory challenges first, and that they never be permitted to go back and challenge a juror accepted by the defense" ( People v Alston , 88 NY2d 519, 529 ). | 3 | 6 |
People v. Lucianogreen1 sentence2018The requirement that the People make peremptory challenges first "is imperative," and violation of that rule is "a substantial, and not a mere technical error" ( id . at 292, 295; see People v Luciano , 10 NY3d 499, 504 [2008] [noting that the Court of Appeals has "strictly constru(ed)" the statutory language governing the order of peremptory challenges "without exception"]; People v Alston , 88 NY2d 519, 529 [1996] ["the one persistently protected and enunciated rule of jury selection (is) that the People make peremptory challenges first, and that they never be permitted to go back and challe | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Williams
green
1 sentence2018In People v Williams ( 26 NY2d 62 [1970]), after both parties had exercised peremptory challenges, the court allowed the People to make a peremptory challenge to a previously unchallenged juror. | 1 | 2018–2018 |