6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Morrisongreen1 sentence2025Contrary to defendant's assertion, the fact that a codefendant may have received a lesser sentence does not establish that the sentence imposed on him was unduly harsh or severe ( see People v Foli , 145 AD3d 1322 , 1323 [3d Dept 2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 1031 [2017]; People v Morrison , 71 AD3d 1228, 1230 [3d Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 754 [2010]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Vazquezgreen1 sentence2025Given, however, the serious nature of his criminal conduct and the fact that the agreed-upon sentence imposed was significantly less than the maximum allowable, upon due consideration of all of the mitigating and aggravating factors, we do not find that the sentence was unduly harsh or severe, and we decline to take corrective action to modify the sentence in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Vazquez , 222 AD3d 1104, 1105-1106 [3d Dept 2023], lv denied 41 NY3d 944 [2024]). | 1 | 1 |
In re Coxetergreen1 sentence2020In this respect, while we are mindful of the severity of the sanction in Florida, we have considered the mitigating and aggravating factors and applicable past precedent in this state, and have determined that a censure is appropriate under the circumstances ( see Matter of Cohen , 12 AD3d 29, 32 [2004]; Matter of Coxeter , 208 AD2d 1178, 1178 [1994]). | 1 | 1 |
In re Cohengreen1 sentence2020In this respect, while we are mindful of the severity of the sanction in Florida, we have considered the mitigating and aggravating factors and applicable past precedent in this state, and have determined that a censure is appropriate under the circumstances ( see Matter of Cohen , 12 AD3d 29, 32 [2004]; Matter of Coxeter , 208 AD2d 1178, 1178 [1994]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Ahrens
green
1 sentence2025Contrary to defendant's assertion, the fact that a codefendant may have received a lesser sentence does not establish that the sentence imposed on him was unduly harsh or severe ( see People v Foli , 145 AD3d 1322 , 1323 [3d Dept 2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 1031 [2017]; People v Morrison , 71 AD3d 1228, 1230 [3d Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 754 [2010]). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Dixon
green
1 sentence2025Contrary to defendant's assertion, the fact that a codefendant may have received a lesser sentence does not establish that the sentence imposed on him was unduly harsh or severe ( see People v Foli , 145 AD3d 1322 , 1323 [3d Dept 2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 1031 [2017]; People v Morrison , 71 AD3d 1228, 1230 [3d Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 754 [2010]). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Matter of Hamling
neutral
1 sentence2023Having already determined that respondent's conviction constitutes a serious crime within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d) ( Matter of Hamling , 212 AD3d at 1077 ), our only remaining obligation concerning this matter is the imposition of a disciplinary sanction, and we therefore turn our attention to the Referee's report, as well as the mitigating and aggravating factors cited by the parties in their submissions regarding the Referee's report. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Matter of Colby
green
1 sentence2021Matter of Campbell , 160 AD3d 1200 [2018]; Matter of Colby , 156 AD3d 1215 [2017]; Matter of Frank , 135 AD3d 1152 [2016]). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In re Frank
neutral
1 sentence2021Matter of Campbell , 160 AD3d 1200 [2018]; Matter of Colby , 156 AD3d 1215 [2017]; Matter of Frank , 135 AD3d 1152 [2016]). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Matter of Farkas
neutral
1 sentence2018Based upon the foregoing, we find that, in view of the respondent's admitted misconduct, which demonstrates a longstanding failure to abide by the rules governing attorney accounts, including his failure to promptly disburse funds to clients, maintain required records, and reconcile the special account, and engaging in the commingling of business funds with client funds, as well as the mitigating and aggravating factors presented herein, a suspension from the practice of law is warranted ( see Matter of Farkas , 133 AD3d 81 ; Matter of Barclay , 114 AD3d 128 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In re Barclay
neutral
1 sentence2018Based upon the foregoing, we find that, in view of the respondent's admitted misconduct, which demonstrates a longstanding failure to abide by the rules governing attorney accounts, including his failure to promptly disburse funds to clients, maintain required records, and reconcile the special account, and engaging in the commingling of business funds with client funds, as well as the mitigating and aggravating factors presented herein, a suspension from the practice of law is warranted ( see Matter of Farkas , 133 AD3d 81 ; Matter of Barclay , 114 AD3d 128 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Peter S. Gordon
green
1 sentence2015The Second Circuit further noted that the lack of candor was “not especially egregious” in that “it concerned only one of several issues before the [CAG]; it was not part of a pattern; the underlying conduct (the failure to comply with the April 2011 order), by itself, would likely warrant no more than a reprimand; and the lack of candor did not seriously disrupt the [CAG’s] proceedings or cause any other serious prejudice.” ( 780 F3d at 161 .) Weighing all of the respondent’s misconduct, and the mitigating and aggravating factors, including his lack of candor, the Second Circuit concluded tha | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.