Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1903–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Foxgreen1 sentence1976(See, People v Fox, supra, pp 210, 212 .) 5 As this court pointed out in that case, the Legislature, in setting the penalties for violation of section 1192, provided very different penalties for violation of subdivision 1 of section 1192 and subdivision 2 of section 1192. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howard v. Fleming
green
2 sentences1974Undue leniency in one case does not transform a reasonable punishment in another case to a cruel one.” (Howard v. Fleming, 191 U. S. 126, 135-136 .) “ The ¡comparative gravity of criminal offenses and whether their consequences are more or less injurious are matters for * * * [a State’s] determination.” (Pennsylvania v. Ashe, 302 U. S. 51, 55 .) Thirdly, the indeterminate sentence with its lifetime maximum for the drug sale and possession offenses with which defendant is charged cannot be fairly said to be unacceptable to modern, law-abiding society. 1974Undue leniency in one case does not transform a reasonable punishment in another case to a cruel one.’ (Howard v. Fleming, 191 U. S. 126, 135-436 .) ' The comparative gravity of criminal offenses and whether their consequences are more or less injurious are matters for * * * [a State’s] determination.’ (Pennsylvania v. Ashe, 302 U. S. 51, 55 .) ” Some of our sister States have similar and in some instances more severe sentences. | 2 | 1974–1974 |
Pennsylvania Ex Rel. Sullivan v. Ashe
green
2 sentences1974Undue leniency in one case does not transform a reasonable punishment in another case to a cruel one.” (Howard v. Fleming, 191 U. S. 126, 135-136 .) “ The ¡comparative gravity of criminal offenses and whether their consequences are more or less injurious are matters for * * * [a State’s] determination.” (Pennsylvania v. Ashe, 302 U. S. 51, 55 .) Thirdly, the indeterminate sentence with its lifetime maximum for the drug sale and possession offenses with which defendant is charged cannot be fairly said to be unacceptable to modern, law-abiding society. 1974Undue leniency in one case does not transform a reasonable punishment in another case to a cruel one.’ (Howard v. Fleming, 191 U. S. 126, 135-436 .) ' The comparative gravity of criminal offenses and whether their consequences are more or less injurious are matters for * * * [a State’s] determination.’ (Pennsylvania v. Ashe, 302 U. S. 51, 55 .) ” Some of our sister States have similar and in some instances more severe sentences. | 2 | 1974–1974 |
Allied Sanitation, Inc. v. Adduci
neutral
1 sentence1996We conclude, therefore, that the summons issued pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 385 was a proper means of charging Corona with a violation of the vehicle weight regulations applicable in New York City (see, Matter of Allied Sanitation v Adduci, 226 AD2d 195 ; Rules of City of New York, Department of Transportation, tit 34, § 4-15 [b] [9]). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Marks
neutral
1 sentence1941(People v. Marks, 64 Misc. 679 .) The defendant now complains of the severity of the remaining fines which it seeks to have remitted in this court, and contends that, although they are not excessive in law, still they show that the magistrate “ abused his discretion,” and was biased in fixing such amounts, particularly by considering the previous court record of this company. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Griffin v. City of Gloversville
neutral
1 sentence1903(Village of Carthage v. Frederick, 122 N. Y. 268 ; Griffin, v. City of Gloversville, 67 App. Div. 403 ; City of Buffalo v. N. Y., L. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Village of Carthage v. . Frederick
green
1 sentence1903(Village of Carthage v. Frederick, 122 N. Y. 268 ; Griffin, v. City of Gloversville, 67 App. Div. 403 ; City of Buffalo v. N. Y., L. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.