Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bouyeagreen2 sentences2014We thus conclude that any alleged defect in the notice was harmless “inasmuch as defendant received reasonable notice of the accusations against him and was provided an opportunity to be heard with respect to those accusations during the persistent felony offender proceeding” (People v Gonzalez, 61 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 925 [2009]; see People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140, 1142 [1985]; see e.g. 2014We thus conclude that any alleged defect in the notice was harmless “inasmuch as defendant received reasonable notice of the accusations against him and was provided an opportunity to be heard with respect to those accusations during the persistent felony offender proceeding” (People v Gonzalez, 61 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 925 [2009]; see People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140, 1142 [1985]; see e.g. | 3 | 3 |
People v. Gonzalezgreen2 sentences2014We thus conclude that any alleged defect in the notice was harmless “inasmuch as defendant received reasonable notice of the accusations against him and was provided an opportunity to be heard with respect to those accusations during the persistent felony offender proceeding” (People v Gonzalez, 61 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 925 [2009]; see People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140, 1142 [1985]; see e.g. 2014We thus conclude that any alleged defect in the notice was harmless “inasmuch as defendant received reasonable notice of the accusations against him and was provided an opportunity to be heard with respect to those accusations during the persistent felony offender proceeding” (People v Gonzalez, 61 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 925 [2009]; see People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140, 1142 [1985]; see e.g. | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Fernandes
green
2 sentences2014We thus conclude that any alleged defect in the notice was harmless “inasmuch as defendant received reasonable notice of the accusations against him and was provided an opportunity to be heard with respect to those accusations during the persistent felony offender proceeding” (People v Gonzalez, 61 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 925 [2009]; see People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140, 1142 [1985]; see e.g. 2014We thus conclude that any alleged defect in the notice was harmless “inasmuch as defendant received reasonable notice of the accusations against him and was provided an opportunity to be heard with respect to those accusations during the persistent felony offender proceeding” (People v Gonzalez, 61 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 925 [2009]; see People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140, 1142 [1985]; see e.g. | 3 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Oliver
green
2 sentences2014That mistake, however, was corrected in a statement filed by the prosecutor and was addressed at the PFO hearing (see People v Oliver, 96 AD2d 1104 , 1105-1106 [1983], affd 63 NY2d 973 [1984]). 2014That mistake, however, was corrected in a statement filed by the prosecutor and was addressed at the PFO hearing (see People v Oliver, 96 AD2d 1104 , 1105-1106 [1983], affd 63 NY2d 973 [1984]). | 3 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Oliver
green
2 sentences2014That mistake, however, was corrected in a statement filed by the prosecutor and was addressed at the PFO hearing (see People v Oliver, 96 AD2d 1104 , 1105-1106 [1983], affd 63 NY2d 973 [1984]). 2014That mistake, however, was corrected in a statement filed by the prosecutor and was addressed at the PFO hearing (see People v Oliver, 96 AD2d 1104 , 1105-1106 [1983], affd 63 NY2d 973 [1984]). | 3 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Smart
neutral
2 sentences2012A 1989 conviction of burglary in the second degree was reversed (People v Smart, 171 AD2d 1072 [1991]). 2012A 1989 conviction of burglary in the second degree was reversed (People v Smart, 171 AD2d 1072 [1991]). | 3 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.