plaintiff seeks defense (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

plaintiff seeks defense in New York

6 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Miccio v. National Surety Corp. green
nyappdiv · 1991
2 sentences

2013Corp., 170 AD2d at 938 ; Acorn Ponds v Hartford Ins.

2013Corp., 170 AD2d at 938 ; Acorn Ponds v Hartford Ins.

22013–2013
Van Wie Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors, LLC green
nyappdiv · 2016
1 sentence

2017However, permitting the plaintiff to challenge the addition of the Westbury dealership under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 463 (2) (ff) would essentially render the standing requirement and specific procedures set forth in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 463 (2) (cc) superfluous (see Van Wie Chevrolet, Inc. v General Motors, LLC, 145 AD3d at 8-9 ).

12017–2017
Robinson v. Jewish Hospital & Medical Center green
nyappdiv · 2000
1 sentence

2000Aviation, 275 AD2d 362 [decided herewith]; see also, A to Z Applique Die Cutting v 319 McKibbin St.

12000–2000
Melcher v. . Ocean Accident Guarantee Corp. neutral
ny · 1919
1 sentence

1955Corp., 226 N. Y. 51 .) The plaintiff seeks to bar defendant’s plea of late notice because under rule 92 of the Rules of Civil Practice defendant’s denial of due performance by plaintiff was in general terms.

11955–1955
James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd. green
ny · 1931
1 sentence

1940It is equally plain that no such immunity can be afforded by means of a declaratory judgment, for even though it be assumed that the defendant is under a statutory duty to enforce its fair trade agreements and that it has, by failing to discharge that duty, abandoned its rights under the agreements, nevertheless price cutting by the plaintiff would remain actionable “ at the suit of any person damaged thereby,” including competing retailers. “ The general purpose of the declaratory judgment is to serve some practical end in quieting or stabilizing an uncertain or disputed jural relation either

11940–1940

Where else courts name it

NY 6 (1940–2017) CA 4 (2017–2017) TX 4 (2020–2020) MI 3 (2010–2023) IL 2 (2005–2005) OH 2 (2007–2019) MA 2 (1951–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check