Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Gibbonsgreen2 sentences2013Thus, “the hearing must be reopened” to afford him that opportunity (People v McGee, 155 AD2d 878, 879 [1989]; see People v Tindal, 92 AD2d 717, 717 [1983]). 2013Thus, “the hearing must be reopened” to afford him that opportunity (People v McGee, 155 AD2d 878, 879 [1989]; see People v Tindal, 92 AD2d 717, 717 [1983]). | 3 | 3 |
People v. Robertsgreen2 sentences2014Consequently, we held the case, reserved decision, and remitted the matter to County Court for a hearing that would give defendant the “opportunity to explore the issues of spontaneity or the effect of the previously-given Miranda warnings, or to raise any other issues regarding the admissibility of those statements” (People v Roberts, 110 AD3d 1466, 1468 [2013]). 2014Consequently, we held the case, reserved decision, and remitted the matter to County Court for a hearing that would give defendant the “opportunity to explore the issues of spontaneity or the effect of the previously-given Miranda warnings, or to raise any other issues regarding the admissibility of those statements” (People v Roberts, 110 AD3d 1466, 1468 [2013]). | 2 | 3 |
People v. McGeegreen2 sentences2013Thus, “the hearing must be reopened” to afford him that opportunity (People v McGee, 155 AD2d 878, 879 [1989]; see People v Tindal, 92 AD2d 717, 717 [1983]). 2013Thus, “the hearing must be reopened” to afford him that opportunity (People v McGee, 155 AD2d 878, 879 [1989]; see People v Tindal, 92 AD2d 717, 717 [1983]). | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.