Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1981–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tankersley v. Szesnatgreen1 sentence1997Acknowledging that a party seeking summary judgment must submit evidentiary proof in admissible form (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067 ), “‘a moving defendant may rely upon the unsworn reports of the plaintiffs own physicians in support of a motion for summary judgment’ ” (Tankersley v Szesnat, 235 AD2d 1010, 1012, n 3 , quoting Torres v Micheletti, 208 AD2d 519 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Allende
green
1 sentence2010Here, where the District Court’s intent to impose a sentence of an additional 60 days for the violation of probation was apparent from the face of the records of the violation of probation proceeding and the original sentencing for the violation of probation, the resentencing for the violation was permissible (see Wright at 614 ; Minaya at 364-365 ; cf. People v Richardson, 100 NY2d 847 [2003]; People v Allende, 78 AD3d 553 [1st Dept 2010]). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Richardson
green
1 sentence2010Here, where the District Court’s intent to impose a sentence of an additional 60 days for the violation of probation was apparent from the face of the records of the violation of probation proceeding and the original sentencing for the violation of probation, the resentencing for the violation was permissible (see Wright at 614 ; Minaya at 364-365 ; cf. People v Richardson, 100 NY2d 847 [2003]; People v Allende, 78 AD3d 553 [1st Dept 2010]). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Campbell v. Kelly
green
1 sentence2000Corp., 42 AD2d 601 ; Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 8-1101 [Farrell 11th ed]). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Torres v. Micheletti
neutral
1 sentence1997Acknowledging that a party seeking summary judgment must submit evidentiary proof in admissible form (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067 ), “‘a moving defendant may rely upon the unsworn reports of the plaintiffs own physicians in support of a motion for summary judgment’ ” (Tankersley v Szesnat, 235 AD2d 1010, 1012, n 3 , quoting Torres v Micheletti, 208 AD2d 519 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.
green
1 sentence1997Acknowledging that a party seeking summary judgment must submit evidentiary proof in admissible form (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067 ), “‘a moving defendant may rely upon the unsworn reports of the plaintiffs own physicians in support of a motion for summary judgment’ ” (Tankersley v Szesnat, 235 AD2d 1010, 1012, n 3 , quoting Torres v Micheletti, 208 AD2d 519 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
People v. Rosario
green
1 sentence1991The Assistant District Attorney requested that the court conduct an in camera review of the records and, except for certain statements which the People conceded should be furnished to the defense pursuant to People v Rosario ( 9 NY2d 286 [1961]), asked the court to issue a protective order precluding the discovery of the records by the defense. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Meyer v. State Tax Commission
green
1 sentence1988Respondent was not required to accept the total accuracy of the records that were produced by petitioner since they were self-serving and not subject to independent verification (see, Matter of Meyer v State Tax Commn., 61 AD2d 223, 225 , lv denied 44 NY2d 645 ). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
General Time Corp. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
green
1 sentence1981Comm. v General Time Corp., 407 F2d 65, cert den 393 US 1026 ). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.