Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ballardgreen2 sentences2011See id. “[W]here the record discloses that the trial court personally addressed the defendant during his plea hearing and informed him of his constitutional rights as contained in Crim.R. 11, the omission of not informing the defendant of one of the non-constitutional rights * * * would not per se constitute prejudicial error, or plain error.” State v. Ballard (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 473, 475 , citing Stewart. “[T]he test is whether the plea would otherwise have been made.” Stewart, at 93. 2001Id. | 1 | 4 |
State v. Stewartgreen1 sentence2011See id. “[W]here the record discloses that the trial court personally addressed the defendant during his plea hearing and informed him of his constitutional rights as contained in Crim.R. 11, the omission of not informing the defendant of one of the non-constitutional rights * * * would not per se constitute prejudicial error, or plain error.” State v. Ballard (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 473, 475 , citing Stewart. “[T]he test is whether the plea would otherwise have been made.” Stewart, at 93. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hawkins
green
1 sentence2025To satisfy the requirement of informing a defendant of the effect of a guilty plea to a petty offense, a trial court need only state “that a plea of guilty is a complete admission of guilt.” Jones at ¶ 25 . {¶ 13} In State v. Hawkins, 2013-Ohio-2572 (2d Dist.), the primary case on which Halderman relies, we held that Crim.R. 11 obligated the trial court to inform the defendant during his plea hearing of the punitive sex-offender registration and community-notification requirements of the Adam Walsh Act. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2018Id. at 133 , 532 N.E.2d 1295 . 2018Id. at 133 , 532 N.E.2d 1295 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |