Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re E.J.green2 sentences2025In re E.J., 2024-Ohio-2421, at ¶ 28 (1st Dist.), citing R.C. 2151.414(B)(1). {¶51} Mother’s challenge is limited to the juvenile court’s best-interest determination. 1. 2025In re E.J., 2024-Ohio-2421, at ¶ 28 (1st Dist.), citing R.C. 2151.414(B)(1). {¶51} Mother’s challenge is limited to the juvenile court’s best-interest determination. 1. | 1 | 1 |
Patterson v. V & M Auto Bodygreen1 sentence2025Capacity to be Sued {¶15} “It is well established that both plaintiff and defendant in a lawsuit must be legal entities with the capacity to be sued.” Patterson v. V & M Auto Body, 63 Ohio St.3d 573, 574 (1992). {¶16} The law uses the Latin phrase “sui juris,” which translates literally to “of its own right/power,” to connote an entity “[o]f full age and capacity” or “[p]ossessing full social and civil rights.” Black’s Law Dictionary (8th Ed. 2004). | 1 | 1 |
In re J.E.green2 sentences2019See R.C. 2151.414(A)(2); see also In re J.E., 2017-Ohio-8272 , 100 N.E.3d 151, at ¶ 16 . 2019See R.C. 2151.414(A)(2); see also In re J.E., 2017-Ohio-8272 , 100 N.E.3d 151, at ¶ 16 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Curry v. Mansfield
green
1 sentence2023Although Epps’s briefs are somewhat sparse in detail, “[i]n the interest of fairness and justice, we will entertain 3 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS all cognizable arguments presented.” Id. {¶7} In three assignments of error, Epps argues that the juvenile court erred by denying her right to counsel; by conducting an in-camera interview with J.M.; and by acting contrary to J.M.’s best interests when it denied her motion for custody and granted HCJFS’s motion for permanent custody. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In re Hoffman
green
1 sentence2013Thus, the 12 of 22 provision is inapplicable and cannot serve as a basis for terminating Knight's parental rights. - 11 - {¶43} We must emphasize that termination of parental rights is referred to as "'the family law equivalent of the death penalty in a criminal case.''' In re Hoffman, 97 Ohio St.3d 92 , 2002-Ohio-5368 , 776 N.E.2d 485 , at ¶14, quoting In re Smith, 77 Ohio App.3d 1, 16 , 601 N.E.2d 45 (1991). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In Re Smith
green
2 sentences2013Thus, the 12 of 22 provision is inapplicable and cannot serve as a basis for terminating Knight's parental rights. - 11 - {¶43} We must emphasize that termination of parental rights is referred to as "'the family law equivalent of the death penalty in a criminal case.''' In re Hoffman, 97 Ohio St.3d 92 , 2002-Ohio-5368 , 776 N.E.2d 485 , at ¶14, quoting In re Smith, 77 Ohio App.3d 1, 16 , 601 N.E.2d 45 (1991). 2013Thus, the 12 of 22 provision is inapplicable and cannot serve as a basis for terminating Knight's parental rights. - 11 - {¶43} We must emphasize that termination of parental rights is referred to as "'the family law equivalent of the death penalty in a criminal case.''' In re Hoffman, 97 Ohio St.3d 92 , 2002-Ohio-5368 , 776 N.E.2d 485 , at ¶14, quoting In re Smith, 77 Ohio App.3d 1, 16 , 601 N.E.2d 45 (1991). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In re Hoffman
green
1 sentence2013Thus, the 12 of 22 provision is inapplicable and cannot serve as a basis for terminating Knight's parental rights. - 11 - {¶43} We must emphasize that termination of parental rights is referred to as "'the family law equivalent of the death penalty in a criminal case.''' In re Hoffman, 97 Ohio St.3d 92 , 2002-Ohio-5368 , 776 N.E.2d 485 , at ¶14, quoting In re Smith, 77 Ohio App.3d 1, 16 , 601 N.E.2d 45 (1991). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In re Williams
green
2 sentences2011Multiple witnesses testified in support of HCJFS’s motion, including Tarver, the family’s ongoing HCJFS caseworker; Amy Muddiman, W.W.’s treatment coordinator at Altercrest who discussed his progress; Karen Black, the visitation facilitator at the Family Nurturing Center who supervised some of the Winkles’ family visits; Kathleen Ann Murphy, an assessment specialist who diagnosed Kenneth as having a narcissist personality; W.W.’s foster father, who expressed the foster family’s wish to adopt W.W.; Denise Gray, who attempted to provide domestic-violence and parenting classes to Diana through th 2011Multiple witnesses testified in support of HCJFS’s motion, including Tarver, the family’s ongoing HCJFS caseworker; Amy Muddiman, W.W.’s treatment coordinator at Altercrest who discussed his progress; Karen Black, the visitation facilitator at the Family Nurturing Center who supervised some of the Winkles’ family visits; Kathleen Ann Murphy, an assessment specialist who diagnosed Kenneth as having a narcissist personality; W.W.’s foster father, who expressed the foster family’s wish to adopt W.W.; Denise Gray, who attempted to provide domestic-violence and parenting classes to Diana through th | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.