lis pendens is to charge third doctrine (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

lis pendens is to charge third doctrine in Ohio

6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Bank of New York v. Barclay, Unpublished Decision (3-16-2004) green
ohioctapp · 2004
2 sentences

2022No. 03AP-844, 2004-Ohio-1217, ¶ 10 .

2018No. 03AP-844, 2004-Ohio-1217, ¶ 10 .

52012–2022
Nationstar Mtge., L.L.C. v. Kereszturi neutral
ohioctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2014Trumbull No. 2013-T-0065, 2013-Ohio-5849, ¶ 7 , quoting Irwin Mtge.

12014–2014
Irwin Mortgage Corp. v. DuPee green
ohioctapp · 2012
1 sentence

2013“The general intent and effect of the doctrine of lis pendens is to charge third persons with notice of the pendency of an action, and to make any interest acquired by such third persons subject to the outcome and judgment or decree of the pending lawsuit.” Irwin Mortgage Corp. v. Dupee, 197 Ohio App. 3d 117 , 2012-Ohio- 4 1594, ¶9 (12th Dist.), citing Bank of New York v. Barclay, 10th Dist.

12013–2013

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2703.26 (6)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check