reunification requirement (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

reunification requirement in Ohio

6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
In re D.E.green
ohioctapp · 2018 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024As we have previously recognized, "'[a] child's best interests are served by the child being placed in a permanent situation that fosters growth, stability, and security.'" In re I.C., 2022-Ohio-3101, ¶ 45 (12th Dist.), quoting In re D.E., 2018-Ohio-3341, ¶ 60 (12th Dist.).

11
In re I.C.green
ohioctapp · 2022 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024As we have previously recognized, "'[a] child's best interests are served by the child being placed in a permanent situation that fosters growth, stability, and security.'" In re I.C., 2022-Ohio-3101, ¶ 45 (12th Dist.), quoting In re D.E., 2018-Ohio-3341, ¶ 60 (12th Dist.).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Weaver green
ohioctapp · 1992
2 sentences

2020With regard to the reunification requirement, this Court noted as follows: * * * “Reasonable efforts are described as being a good faith effort which is ‘an honest, purposeful effort, free of malice and the desire to defraud or to seek an unconscionable advantage.’ ” In re Cranford (July 24, 1998), Montgomery App. Nos. 17085 and 17105, citing In re Weaver (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 59 , 606 N.E.2d 1011 .

2020With regard to the reunification requirement, this Court noted as follows: * * * “Reasonable efforts are described as being a good faith effort which is ‘an honest, purposeful effort, free of malice and the desire to defraud or to seek an unconscionable advantage.’ ” In re Cranford (July 24, 1998), Montgomery App. Nos. 17085 and 17105, citing In re Weaver (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 59 , 606 N.E.2d 1011 .

42002–2020
In re Glenn green
ohioctapp · 2000
1 sentence

2019In re Glenn, 139 Ohio App.3d 105, 113 , 742 N.E.2d 1210 (8th Dist.2000).

12019–2019
In Re Glenn neutral
ohioctapp · 2000
1 sentence

2019In re Glenn, 139 Ohio App.3d 105, 113 , 742 N.E.2d 1210 (8th Dist.2000).

12019–2019

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.414 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.413 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 6 (2002–2024) WA 2 (2010–2010) ME 2 (1994–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check