Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re J.C.S.green2 sentences2026Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). 15 {¶ 50} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Oh 2025Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). {¶ 69} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Ohio- | 2 | 2 |
State ex rel. Ballard v. O'Donnellgreen2 sentences2026Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). 15 {¶ 50} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Oh 2025Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). {¶ 69} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Ohio- | 2 | 2 |
In re J.T.green2 sentences2026Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). 15 {¶ 50} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Oh 2025Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). {¶ 69} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Ohio- | 2 | 2 |
In re R.P.green2 sentences2026Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). 15 {¶ 50} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Oh 2025Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). {¶ 69} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Ohio- | 2 | 2 |
In Re Keith, Unpublished Decision (4-16-2004)green2 sentences2026Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). 15 {¶ 50} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Oh 2026Ballard v. O’Donnell, 50 Ohio St.3d 182, 183 (1990) (“‘It is axiomatic that . . . a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void.’”), quoting Lincoln Tavern, Inc. v. Snader, 165 Ohio St. 61 , 64 (1956). 15 {¶ 50} “R.C. 2151.414(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that when a motion for permanent custody is filed, ‘the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child’s guardian ad litem.’” In re J.C.S., 2023-Oh | 2 | 2 |
State v. Thompkinsred1 sentence2006See also, State v. Thompkins (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 380 . {¶ 28} R.C. § 2151.414 provides in part: {¶ 29} "(A)(1) Upon the filing of a motion pursuant to section 2151.413 of the Revised Code for permanent custody of a child, the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing, in accordance with section 2151.29 of the Revised Code, to all parties to the action and to the child's guardian ad litem. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Miller
green
2 sentences2026“It has been described as ‘“a method of last resort.”’” Id., quoting J.T. at ¶ 38, quoting In re Miller, 33 Ohio App.3d 224, 226 , (8th Dist. 1986). 2025“It has been described as ‘“a method of last resort.”’” Id., quoting J.T. at ¶ 38, quoting In re Miller, 33 Ohio App.3d 224, 226 , (8th Dist. 1986). | 2 | 2025–2026 |
State v. Holloway
green
2 sentences2024It is this selection that precludes him from succeeding in this appeal. {¶ 7} R.C. 2981.03(A)(4) states “[a] person aggrieved by an alleged unlawful seizure of property may seek relief from the seizure by filing a motion in the appropriate 1 R.C. 2981.11(A)(1) provides the framework for the return of lawfully seized property that is not subject to forfeiture. 3. court that shows the person’s interest in the property, states why the seizure was unlawful, and requests the property’s return.” If a motion meeting these requirements is filed “before an indictment, information, or a complaint seekin 2024If a motion is filed subsequent to the indictment, information, or forfeiture complaint, “the court shall treat the motion as a motion to suppress evidence.” Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In re D.R.
neutral
1 sentence2021Licking Nos. 2020 CA 00024 and 2020 CA 00025, 2020-Ohio-4025, ¶ 22 , citing In re Kincaid, 4th Dist. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In re Adoption of Lay
green
1 sentence2008In re Lay (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 41 , 42 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
In re Adoption of Holcomb
green
1 sentence2008"Upon the filing of a motion * * * for permanent custody of a child, the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing * * * to all parties to the action and to the child's guardian ad litem." R.C. 2151.414 (A)(1). "[T]he court may grant permanent custody of a child to a movant if the court determines at the hearing * * *, by clear and convincing evidence, that it is in the best interest of the child to grant *Page 9 permanent custody of the child to the agency that filed the motion for permanent custody and * * * the child cannot be placed with | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Wilson
green
1 sentence2008"Upon the filing of a motion * * * for permanent custody of a child, the court shall schedule a hearing and give notice of the filing of the motion and of the hearing * * * to all parties to the action and to the child's guardian ad litem." R.C. 2151.414 (A)(1). "[T]he court may grant permanent custody of a child to a movant if the court determines at the hearing * * *, by clear and convincing evidence, that it is in the best interest of the child to grant *Page 9 permanent custody of the child to the agency that filed the motion for permanent custody and * * * the child cannot be placed with | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.