Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 2020–2022 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.green2 sentences2022See In re State Question 807 , 2020 OK 57 468 P.3d 383 Murphy v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n , 138 S. Ct. 1461, 1477 (2018) (quotation omitted). ¶9 The CSA does not violate the anti-commandeering doctrine by preempting state laws which undermine its purpose and objectives. 2022See In re State Question 807 , 2020 OK 57 468 P.3d 383 Murphy v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n , 138 S. Ct. 1461, 1477 (2018) (quotation omitted). ¶9 The CSA does not violate the anti-commandeering doctrine by preempting state laws which undermine its purpose and objectives. | 5 | 5 |
IN RE: STATE QUESTION No. 807, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 423green2 sentences2022See In re State Question 807 , 2020 OK 57 468 P.3d 383 Murphy v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n , 138 S. Ct. 1461, 1477 (2018) (quotation omitted). ¶9 The CSA does not violate the anti-commandeering doctrine by preempting state laws which undermine its purpose and objectives. 2022See In re State Question 807 , 2020 OK 57 468 P.3d 383 Murphy v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n , 138 S. Ct. 1461, 1477 (2018) (quotation omitted). ¶9 The CSA does not violate the anti-commandeering doctrine by preempting state laws which undermine its purpose and objectives. | 3 | 4 |
Prigg v. Pennsylvaniagreen2 sentences2022See generally Prigg , 41 U.S. 539; Printz v. United States , 521 U.S. 898 (1997); Murphy v. NCAA , __ U.S.__, 138 S.Ct. 1461 (2018). 2022See generally Prigg , 41 U.S. 539 ; Printz v. United States , 521 U.S. 898 (1997); Murphy v. NCAA , __ U.S.__, 138 S.Ct. 1461 (2018). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Printz v. United States
green
2 sentences2022See generally Prigg , 41 U.S. 539; Printz v. United States , 521 U.S. 898 (1997); Murphy v. NCAA , __ U.S.__, 138 S.Ct. 1461 (2018). 2022See generally Prigg , 41 U.S. 539 ; Printz v. United States , 521 U.S. 898 (1997); Murphy v. NCAA , __ U.S.__, 138 S.Ct. 1461 (2018). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.