Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hamilton v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Jones v. State, 2009 OK CR 1, ¶ 80 , 201 P.3d 869, 889 , cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 237 , 175 L.Ed.2d 163 (2009) (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim was fatally shot after witnessing the shooting of his friends and his sister); Hancock v. State, 2007 OK CR 9, ¶ 121 , 155 P.3d 796, 824 (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim witnessed shooting of friend and was fatally shot while attempting to help friend); Hamilton v. State, 1997 OK CR 14, ¶ 56 , 937 P.2d 1001, 1014 (evidence of aggravator held sufficient where four employees mad 2011See Jones v. State, 2009 OK CR 1, ¶ 80 , 201 P.3d 869, 889 , cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 237 , 175 L.Ed.2d 163 (2009) (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim was fatally shot after witnessing the shooting of his friends and his sister); Hancock v. State, 2007 OK CR 9, ¶ 121 , 155 P.3d 796, 824 (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim witnessed shooting of friend and was fatally shot while attempting to help friend); Hamilton v. State, 1997 OK CR 14, ¶ 56 , 937 P.2d 1001, 1014 (evidence of aggravator held sufficient where four employees mad | 2 | 2 |
Hancock v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Jones v. State, 2009 OK CR 1, ¶ 80 , 201 P.3d 869, 889 , cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 237 , 175 L.Ed.2d 163 (2009) (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim was fatally shot after witnessing the shooting of his friends and his sister); Hancock v. State, 2007 OK CR 9, ¶ 121 , 155 P.3d 796, 824 (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim witnessed shooting of friend and was fatally shot while attempting to help friend); Hamilton v. State, 1997 OK CR 14, ¶ 56 , 937 P.2d 1001, 1014 (evidence of aggravator held sufficient where four employees mad 2011See Jones v. State, 2009 OK CR 1, ¶ 80 , 201 P.3d 869, 889 , cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 237 , 175 L.Ed.2d 163 (2009) (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim was fatally shot after witnessing the shooting of his friends and his sister); Hancock v. State, 2007 OK CR 9, ¶ 121 , 155 P.3d 796, 824 (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim witnessed shooting of friend and was fatally shot while attempting to help friend); Hamilton v. State, 1997 OK CR 14, ¶ 56 , 937 P.2d 1001, 1014 (evidence of aggravator held sufficient where four employees mad | 2 | 2 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Jones v. State, 2009 OK CR 1, ¶ 80 , 201 P.3d 869, 889 , cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 237 , 175 L.Ed.2d 163 (2009) (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim was fatally shot after witnessing the shooting of his friends and his sister); Hancock v. State, 2007 OK CR 9, ¶ 121 , 155 P.3d 796, 824 (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim witnessed shooting of friend and was fatally shot while attempting to help friend); Hamilton v. State, 1997 OK CR 14, ¶ 56 , 937 P.2d 1001, 1014 (evidence of aggravator held sufficient where four employees mad 2011See Jones v. State, 2009 OK CR 1, ¶ 80 , 201 P.3d 869, 889 , cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 237 , 175 L.Ed.2d 163 (2009) (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim was fatally shot after witnessing the shooting of his friends and his sister); Hancock v. State, 2007 OK CR 9, ¶ 121 , 155 P.3d 796, 824 (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim witnessed shooting of friend and was fatally shot while attempting to help friend); Hamilton v. State, 1997 OK CR 14, ¶ 56 , 937 P.2d 1001, 1014 (evidence of aggravator held sufficient where four employees mad | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Postelle v. State
green
2 sentences2018Postelle , 2011 OK CR 30 , ¶ 83, 267 P.3d at 144 . 2018Postelle , 2011 OK CR 30 , ¶ 83, 267 P.3d at 144 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Alverson v. State
green
2 sentences2011See Jones v. State, 2009 OK CR 1, ¶ 80 , 201 P.3d 869, 889 , cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 237 , 175 L.Ed.2d 163 (2009) (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim was fatally shot after witnessing the shooting of his friends and his sister); Hancock v. State, 2007 OK CR 9, ¶ 121 , 155 P.3d 796, 824 (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim witnessed shooting of friend and was fatally shot while attempting to help friend); Hamilton v. State, 1997 OK CR 14, ¶ 56 , 937 P.2d 1001, 1014 (evidence of aggravator held sufficient where four employees mad 2011See Jones v. State, 2009 OK CR 1, ¶ 80 , 201 P.3d 869, 889 , cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 130 S.Ct. 237 , 175 L.Ed.2d 163 (2009) (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim was fatally shot after witnessing the shooting of his friends and his sister); Hancock v. State, 2007 OK CR 9, ¶ 121 , 155 P.3d 796, 824 (evidence sufficient to support aggravator where unarmed victim witnessed shooting of friend and was fatally shot while attempting to help friend); Hamilton v. State, 1997 OK CR 14, ¶ 56 , 937 P.2d 1001, 1014 (evidence of aggravator held sufficient where four employees mad | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hogue
neutral
1 sentence1924Co. v. Hogue (Ark.) 94 S. W. 924 , is cited in the brief of the defendant company in support of its contention that section 4951, supra, appears to have been copied from a statute of that state; that its enactment does not give any new meaning to the mental anguish doctrine, but adopts that doctrine with all its limitations as expressed in the decisions of the courts in those jurisdictions where mental anguish damages have been previously recognized. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Kennon v. Gilmer
green
1 sentence1911It is necessary, therefore, for the court to give the statute a reasonable construction, attempting to carry out the design of the Legislature in putting in force an. element of damages for mental anguish and suffering, for negligence in receiving, transmitting, or delivering messages, and not be bound by the *684 vagaries and inconsistencies which prevail in jurisdictions where it obtains by judicial construction.” The Supreme Court of the United' States has not squarely passed upon the question in a telegraph case, but the rule in that court is clearly indicated by the following quotation fr | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.