Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 2020–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brenner v. Department of Revenuegreen2 sentences2025Brenner, 9 OTR at 302 n 2. 2024Danielson v. Dept. of Rev., TC-MD 160282C, WL 5158730 at *3 (Or Tax M Div Nov 7, 2017) (quoting Brenner v. Dept. of Rev., 9 OTR 299, 306 (1983)) (internal citations omitted). | 3 | 6 |
Bobby E. Welch and Kathleen Newman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenuegreen1 sentence2024Remaining deposits “are prima facie evidence of income, and the taxpayer bears the burden of showing that the deposits were not taxable income but were derived from a nontaxable source.” Welch v. Comm’r, 204 F3d 1228, 1230 (9th Cir 2000). /// 4 The court’s references to the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) are to 2015. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.