change of circumstance rule (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

change of circumstance rule in Oregon

6 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 1977–1978 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Niedertgreen
orctapp · 1977 · cited in 4 Oregon opinions naming this issue, 1977–1978
2 sentences

1978In Niedert and Niedert, 28 Or App 309, 313 , 559 P2d 515 , rev den (1977), we said: "The change-of-circumstance rule is designed to serve two functions: to discourage repeated litigation of the same issues and, more important, to provide young children with a stable environment. * * * We have long recognized the importance of a stable and secure home life and have consequently placed a high value on the stability of parental relationships. [Footnote omitted.] Therefore the rule requires a showing of some change in circumstances which makes either the benefits to be gained from a change of cust

1978In Niedert and Niedert, 28 Or App 309, 313 , 559 P2d 515 , rev den (1977), we said: "The change-of-circumstance rule is designed to serve two functions: to discourage repeated litigation of the same issues and, more important, to provide young children with a stable environment. * * * We have long recognized the importance of a stable and secure home life and have consequently placed a high value on the stability of parental relationships. [Footnote omitted.] Therefore the rule requires a showing of some change in circumstances which makes either the benefits to be gained from a change of cust

14

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Crane v. Crane neutral
orctapp · 1974
2 sentences

1977Crane v. Crane, 17 Or App 637 , 523 P2d 596 (1974).

1977Crane v. Crane, 17 Or App 637 , 523 P2d 596 (1974).

21977–1977
Brooks v. Brooks green
orctapp · 1975
2 sentences

1978Brooks v. Brooks, 20 Or App 43, 53-54 , 530 P2d 547 , rev den (1975).

1978Brooks v. Brooks, 20 Or App 43, 53-54 , 530 P2d 547 , rev den (1975).

11978–1978
In re the Marriage of Smith neutral
orctapp · 1978
2 sentences

1978Therefore, the rule requires a showing of some change in circumstances which makes either the benefits to be gained from a change of custody or the detriment caused by not making the change outweigh the damage done to the child who is exposed to shifting parental figures. * * * [Citations omitted.]” See also, Smith and Smith, 36 Or App 461 , 584 P2d 780 (1978) .

1978Therefore, the rule requires a showing of some change in circumstances which makes either the benefits to be gained from a change of custody or the detriment caused by not making the change outweigh the damage done to the child who is exposed to shifting parental figures. * * * [Citations omitted.]” See also, Smith and Smith, 36 Or App 461 , 584 P2d 780 (1978) .

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

OR 6 (1977–1978) CA 5 (1956–2025) LA 5 (1989–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check