Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gibsongreen2 sentences2025“A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence ‘must establish that the error was not harmless.’ ” State v. Gibson, 338 Or 560, 575-76 , 113 P3d 423 , cert den, 546 US 1044 (2005) (quoting State v. Lotches, 331 Or 455, 487 , 17 P3d 1045 (2000), cert den, 534 US 833 (2001)). 2025“A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence ‘must establish that the error was not harmless.’ ” State v. Gibson, 338 Or 560, 575-76 , 113 P3d 423 , cert den, 546 US 1044 (2005) (quoting State v. Lotches, 331 Or 455, 487 , 17 P3d 1045 (2000), cert den, 534 US 833 (2001)). | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hilgert v. Mark Twain/Mercantile Bank
green
2 sentences2025“A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence ‘must establish that the error was not harmless.’ ” State v. Gibson, 338 Or 560, 575-76 , 113 P3d 423 , cert den, 546 US 1044 (2005) (quoting State v. Lotches, 331 Or 455, 487 , 17 P3d 1045 (2000), cert den, 534 US 833 (2001)). 2025“A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence ‘must establish that the error was not harmless.’ ” State v. Gibson, 338 Or 560, 575-76 , 113 P3d 423 , cert den, 546 US 1044 (2005) (quoting State v. Lotches, 331 Or 455, 487 , 17 P3d 1045 (2000), cert den, 534 US 833 (2001)). | 5 | 2005–2025 |
State v. Lotches
green
2 sentences2025“A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence ‘must establish that the error was not harmless.’ ” State v. Gibson, 338 Or 560, 575-76 , 113 P3d 423 , cert den, 546 US 1044 (2005) (quoting State v. Lotches, 331 Or 455, 487 , 17 P3d 1045 (2000), cert den, 534 US 833 (2001)). 2025“A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence ‘must establish that the error was not harmless.’ ” State v. Gibson, 338 Or 560, 575-76 , 113 P3d 423 , cert den, 546 US 1044 (2005) (quoting State v. Lotches, 331 Or 455, 487 , 17 P3d 1045 (2000), cert den, 534 US 833 (2001)). | 5 | 2005–2025 |
Tinsley v. Million
green
2 sentences2025“A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence ‘must establish that the error was not harmless.’ ” State v. Gibson, 338 Or 560, 575-76 , 113 P3d 423 , cert den, 546 US 1044 (2005) (quoting State v. Lotches, 331 Or 455, 487 , 17 P3d 1045 (2000), cert den, 534 US 833 (2001)). 2025“A criminal defendant who assigns error to the exclusion or admission of evidence ‘must establish that the error was not harmless.’ ” State v. Gibson, 338 Or 560, 575-76 , 113 P3d 423 , cert den, 546 US 1044 (2005) (quoting State v. Lotches, 331 Or 455, 487 , 17 P3d 1045 (2000), cert den, 534 US 833 (2001)). | 4 | 2023–2025 |
State v. Durando
green
2 sentences2025In making the determination of whether there is little likeli- hood that a particular error affected the verdict, “we exam- ine the record as a whole and consider the error and the context in which it occurred.” State v. Durando, 262 Or App 299, 305 , 323 P3d 985 , adh’d to as modified on recons, 264 Or App 289 , 331 P3d 1095 , rev den, 356 Or 400 (2014). 2025In making the determination of whether there is little likeli- hood that a particular error affected the verdict, “we exam- ine the record as a whole and consider the error and the context in which it occurred.” State v. Durando, 262 Or App 299, 305 , 323 P3d 985 , adh’d to as modified on recons, 264 Or App 289 , 331 P3d 1095 , rev den, 356 Or 400 (2014). | 4 | 2023–2025 |
State v. Durando
green
2 sentences2025In making the determination of whether there is little likeli- hood that a particular error affected the verdict, “we exam- ine the record as a whole and consider the error and the context in which it occurred.” State v. Durando, 262 Or App 299, 305 , 323 P3d 985 , adh’d to as modified on recons, 264 Or App 289 , 331 P3d 1095 , rev den, 356 Or 400 (2014). 2025In making the determination of whether there is little likeli- hood that a particular error affected the verdict, “we exam- ine the record as a whole and consider the error and the context in which it occurred.” State v. Durando, 262 Or App 299, 305 , 323 P3d 985 , adh’d to as modified on recons, 264 Or App 289 , 331 P3d 1095 , rev den, 356 Or 400 (2014). | 4 | 2023–2025 |