employer accepted claim (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

employer accepted claim in Oregon

6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
SAIF Corp. v. Sprague green
or · 2009
2 sentences

2017Id.

2017Id.

22017–2017
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Piwowar green
or · 1988
2 sentences

2001Piwowar, 305 Or at 497 .

1993Therefore, it had accepted the compensability of the disease. 305 Or at 501 .

21993–2001
Freightliner Corp. v. Christensen green
orctapp · 1999
2 sentences

2001In Freightliner Corp. v. Christensen, 163 Or App 191 , 986 P2d 1263 (1999), we held that, when the employer accepted a claim for “low back pain,” it also accepted “all the conditions that the medical evidence shows underlie the low back pain, including claimant’s preexisting degenerative back conditions.” Id. at 196 .

2001In Freightliner Corp. v. Christensen, 163 Or App 191 , 986 P2d 1263 (1999), we held that, when the employer accepted a claim for “low back pain,” it also accepted “all the conditions that the medical evidence shows underlie the low back pain, including claimant’s preexisting degenerative back conditions.” Id. at 196 .

12001–2001
Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. green
or · 1983
2 sentences

2001Claimant relies on Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788 , 670 P2d 1027 (1983), and Tattoo v. Barrett Business Service, 118 Or App 348 , 847 P2d 872 (1993), for the proposition that employer is bound by the express language of its notice of acceptance, which, in this case, merely accepted “multidirec-tional instability, right shoulder and cervical strain.” In Bauman , the employer accepted a claim and paid benefits for three years.

2001Claimant relies on Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788 , 670 P2d 1027 (1983), and Tattoo v. Barrett Business Service, 118 Or App 348 , 847 P2d 872 (1993), for the proposition that employer is bound by the express language of its notice of acceptance, which, in this case, merely accepted “multidirec-tional instability, right shoulder and cervical strain.” In Bauman , the employer accepted a claim and paid benefits for three years.

12001–2001
Tattoo v. Barrett Business Service green
orctapp · 1993
2 sentences

2001Claimant relies on Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788 , 670 P2d 1027 (1983), and Tattoo v. Barrett Business Service, 118 Or App 348 , 847 P2d 872 (1993), for the proposition that employer is bound by the express language of its notice of acceptance, which, in this case, merely accepted “multidirec-tional instability, right shoulder and cervical strain.” In Bauman , the employer accepted a claim and paid benefits for three years.

2001Claimant relies on Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788 , 670 P2d 1027 (1983), and Tattoo v. Barrett Business Service, 118 Or App 348 , 847 P2d 872 (1993), for the proposition that employer is bound by the express language of its notice of acceptance, which, in this case, merely accepted “multidirec-tional instability, right shoulder and cervical strain.” In Bauman , the employer accepted a claim and paid benefits for three years.

12001–2001
Johnson v. Spectra Physics green
or · 1987
1 sentence

1996In Johnson , the employer accepted a claim for a “back injury” located in the “middle back and arm.” 303 Or at 52 .

11996–1996

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.005 (4) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.262 (4) OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.386 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check