Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1928–1980 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. Empire Holding Corp.green2 sentences1957In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: “* * * As was pointed ont in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or. 28 ( 146 P. 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evident that this rule must be applied with caution.” Wilson v. Empire Holding Co., 145 Or 598 , 28 P2d 843 ; Housley v. Linnton Plywood Assn., 210 Or 520 , 311 P2d 432 ; Brite v. W. 1957In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: “* * * As was pointed ont in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or. 28 ( 146 P. 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evident that this rule must be applied with caution.” Wilson v. Empire Holding Co., 145 Or 598 , 28 P2d 843 ; Housley v. Linnton Plywood Assn., 210 Or 520 , 311 P2d 432 ; Brite v. W. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co.
green
2 sentences1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 | 4 | 1957–1980 |
Whitney v. Bissell
green
2 sentences1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 | 3 | 1957–1980 |
Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et Ux
green
2 sentences1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Mesh v. Citrin
green
2 sentences1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Barron v. Myers
neutral
1 sentence1980In Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), the court stated: "In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: " '* * * As was pointed out in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28 ( 146 P 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evidence that this rule must be applied with caution.’ "In Mesh v. Citrin, 299 Mich 527 300 NW 870 | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Heitkemper v. Schmeer
green
2 sentences1960Heitkemper v. Schmeer et al., 130 Or 644, 659 , 275 P 55 , 281 P 169 ; Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 . 1960Heitkemper v. Schmeer et al., 130 Or 644, 659 , 275 P 55 , 281 P 169 ; Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Housley v. Linnton Plywood Ass'n
green
2 sentences1957In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: “* * * As was pointed ont in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or. 28 ( 146 P. 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evident that this rule must be applied with caution.” Wilson v. Empire Holding Co., 145 Or 598 , 28 P2d 843 ; Housley v. Linnton Plywood Assn., 210 Or 520 , 311 P2d 432 ; Brite v. W. 1957In Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385 , 299 P 698 , we said, in dicta: “* * * As was pointed ont in Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or. 28 ( 146 P. 141 , L.R.A. 1915D, 257 ), notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose. * * * It is evident that this rule must be applied with caution.” Wilson v. Empire Holding Co., 145 Or 598 , 28 P2d 843 ; Housley v. Linnton Plywood Assn., 210 Or 520 , 311 P2d 432 ; Brite v. W. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Kerron
neutral
2 sentences1931To the same effect see Union Central Life Insurance Co. v. Kerron, 128 Or. 70 ( 264 P. 453 ). 1931To the same effect see Union Central Life Insurance Co. v. Kerron, 128 Or. 70 ( 264 P. 453 ). | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Robinson v. Cable
neutral
1 sentence1928A. 1915D, 257), as follows: *83 “The rule as to the knowledge of the fraud before there would be an acquiescence therein is subject to the principle that notice of acts and circumstances which would put a man of ordinary prudence and intelligence upon inquiry is equivalent in the eyes of the law to knowledge of all the facts a reasonably diligent inquiry would disclose: 6 Cyc. 305; Clark on Contracts, p. 236.” Pertaining to the law of rescission, see Robinson v. Cable, 109 Or. 579 ( 217 Pac. 621 ), and the local citations therein noted. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.