Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
George v. Beardgreen2 sentences2022George v. Beard, 824 A.2d 393, 396 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003) (“[W]hile in custody under sentence, an offender’s sole avenues to challenge payment of financial aspects of the sentence are direct appeal or postconviction proceedings.”). 2019We noted that “‘while in custody under sentence, an offender’s sole avenues to challenge payment of financial aspects of the sentence are direct appeal and postconviction proceedings’” and that “‘[t]hese avenues are adequate remedies at law for an offender in custody to challenge any aspect of the sentence.’” Id. (quoting George, 824 A.2d at 396 ). | 2 | 4 |
Buck v. Beardgreen1 sentence2021See also Buck v. Beard, 879 A.2d 157, 161 (Pa. 2005) (due process does not require a judicial hearing regarding an inmate’s ability to pay after his sentencing hearing); Bundy v. Wetzel (Pa. Cmwlth., No. 553 M.D. 2016, filed April 12, 2019) (unreported), slip op. at 18 (offender not entitled to an ability-to-pay hearing, or means to object to Act 84 9 deductions, whenever there is a material change in circumstances).7 “[W]hile in custody under sentence, an offender’s sole avenues to challenge payment of financial aspects of sentence are direct appeal or postconviction proceedings.” George, 824 | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. McGrogangreen2 sentences1976Since counsel did not make a “considered choice, made with a ‘reasonable basis,’ ” Commonwealth v. McGrogan, 449 Pa. 584, 591 , 297 A.2d 456, 460 (1972), we conclude that counsel was ineffective. 1976Since counsel did not make a “considered choice, made with a ‘reasonable basis,’ ” Commonwealth v. McGrogan, 449 Pa. 584, 591 , 297 A.2d 456, 460 (1972), we conclude that counsel was ineffective. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Ronald Richard Fishergreen1 sentence1976As the Fourth Circuit aptly observed in United States v. Fisher, 477 F.2d 300, 302-303 (4th Cir. 1973), “[a] defendant who is subjected to the possibility of incarceration is entitled to have the avenues of defense explored by his counsel during the preparation of the case.” Accord, ABA Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to the Defense Function §4.1, at 225-228 (Approved Draft, 1971). *346 For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that trial counsel’s failure to give notice of an alibi defense was not grounded upon a conscious choice made after a consideration of the st | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ingram v. Newman
green
2 sentences2019We noted that “‘while in custody under sentence, an offender’s sole avenues to challenge payment of financial aspects of the sentence are direct appeal and postconviction proceedings’” and that “‘[t]hese avenues are adequate remedies at law for an offender in custody to challenge any aspect of the sentence.’” Id. (quoting George, 824 A.2d at 396 ). 2019We noted that “‘while in custody under sentence, an offender’s sole avenues to challenge payment of financial aspects of the sentence are direct appeal and postconviction proceedings’” and that “‘[t]hese avenues are adequate remedies at law for an offender in custody to challenge any aspect of the sentence.’” Id. (quoting George, 824 A.2d at 396 ). | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.