Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Com. v. Carter, W.green2 sentences2022Therein, in granting the defendant’s suppression motion, the trial court concluded that an encounter between the police and the defendant was “a custodial interrogation requiring Miranda warnings and a valid waiver, and that [the defendant] did not knowingly, intelligently, or voluntarily waive his Miranda rights.” Carter, 234 A.3d at 732 (citation to trial court opinion omitted). 2022Specifically, the trial court held the defendant did not voluntarily waive his Miranda rights since the Commonwealth failed to establish the defendant was aware of the general nature of “‘the transaction giving rise to the investigation[.]’” Id. at 733 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2021See Ellis, Johnson, supra. Nor for that matter, did the officer's follow-up inquiry, as to the gun's ownership escalate or transform the situation to a custodial interrogation. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Turnergreen1 sentence2020See Commonwealth v. Turner, 772 A.2d 970, 977 (Pa. Super. 2001) (en banc) (stating that while traffic stops “curtail significantly” an individual’s freedom, the detention is typically temporary and brief and does not generally rise to the level of custodial interrogation). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Nestergreen2 sentences1999We have held that we will examine the totality of the circumstances surrounding statements given during noncustodial interrogations, “because a noncustodial interrogation ‘might possibly in some situations, by virtue of some special circumstances,’ result in an involuntary confession.” Commonwealth v. Nester, 551 Pa. 157 , 709 A.2d 879, 882 (1998) (quoting Beckwith v. United States, 425 U.S. 341, 347-48 , 96 S.Ct. 1612 , 48 L.Ed.2d 1 (1976)). 1999We have held that we will examine the totality of the circumstances surrounding statements given during noncustodial interrogations, “because a noncustodial interrogation ‘might possibly in some situations, by virtue of some special circumstances,’ result in an involuntary confession.” Commonwealth v. Nester, 551 Pa. 157 , 709 A.2d 879, 882 (1998) (quoting Beckwith v. United States, 425 U.S. 341, 347-48 , 96 S.Ct. 1612 , 48 L.Ed.2d 1 (1976)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Perry
green
2 sentences2018However, Johnson challenged four different statements he made to police and, with respect to the statement made while in the ambulance, the Supreme Court specifically noted that appellant “does not claim that this questioning amounted to a custodial interrogation requiring Miranda warning.” Id. (emphasis added). 2018Rather, Johnson argued that his physical condition was so severe that “any statement given to police was not given knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.” Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Minnesota v. Murphy
green
1 sentence2012Id., at 429-30, 104 S.Ct. 1136 ; Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2012Id., at 429-30, 104 S.Ct. 1136 ; Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). 2012Id., at 429-30, 104 S.Ct. 1136 ; Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Beckwith v. United States
green
2 sentences1999We have held that we will examine the totality of the circumstances surrounding statements given during noncustodial interrogations, “because a noncustodial interrogation ‘might possibly in some situations, by virtue of some special circumstances,’ result in an involuntary confession.” Commonwealth v. Nester, 551 Pa. 157 , 709 A.2d 879, 882 (1998) (quoting Beckwith v. United States, 425 U.S. 341, 347-48 , 96 S.Ct. 1612 , 48 L.Ed.2d 1 (1976)). 1999We have held that we will examine the totality of the circumstances surrounding statements given during noncustodial interrogations, “because a noncustodial interrogation ‘might possibly in some situations, by virtue of some special circumstances,’ result in an involuntary confession.” Commonwealth v. Nester, 551 Pa. 157 , 709 A.2d 879, 882 (1998) (quoting Beckwith v. United States, 425 U.S. 341, 347-48 , 96 S.Ct. 1612 , 48 L.Ed.2d 1 (1976)). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.