Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Younggreen2 sentences2024Further, our Supreme Court has stated, “In general, the Commonwealth need not prove that the crime occurred on the date alleged in the indictment, except where the date is an essential issue in the case, e.g., where the defendant presents an alibi defense.” Commonwealth v. Young, - 16 - J-A12033-24 748 A.2d 166, 182 (Pa. 1999). 2018In Com. v. Young, 748 A.2d 166, 182 (Pa. 1999), the Supreme Court stated: In general, the Commonwealth need not prove that the crime occurred on the date alleged in the indictment, except where the date is an essential issue in the case, e.g., where the defendant presents an alibi defense. | 4 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Boyergreen2 sentences2018See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Boyer, 216 Pa.Super. 286 , 264 A.2d 173 (Pa.Super. 1970). 1999See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Boyer, 216 Pa.Super. 286 , 264 A.2d 173 (Pa.Super.1970). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Mazzoccoligreen2 sentences2018See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Boyer, 216 Pa.Super. 286 , 264 A.2d 173 (Pa.Super. 1970). 1999See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Boyer, 216 Pa.Super. 286 , 264 A.2d 173 (Pa.Super.1970). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Hackergreen1 sentence2015Similarly, when addressing the effect of a variance between a date charged and that proven at trial, this Court has held, “Unless a variance could mislead the defendant at trial, impairs a substantial right, or involves an element of surprise that would prejudice the defendant’s efforts to prepare a defense, it is not fatal.” Commonwealth v. Hacker, 959 A.2d 380, 390 (Pa. Super. 2008) (citation omitted), rev’d on other grounds, 15 A.3d 333 (Pa. 2011). - 26 - J.A25037/15 In light of the foregoing, we reiterate: In an appellate brief, parties must provide an argument as to each question, which s | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Swintgreen2 sentences1976See Commonwealth v. Swint, 465 Pa. 450 , 350 A.2d 851 (1976). 1976See Commonwealth v. Swint, 465 Pa. 450 , 350 A.2d 851 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Houseman
green
1 sentence2015Similarly, when addressing the effect of a variance between a date charged and that proven at trial, this Court has held, “Unless a variance could mislead the defendant at trial, impairs a substantial right, or involves an element of surprise that would prejudice the defendant’s efforts to prepare a defense, it is not fatal.” Commonwealth v. Hacker, 959 A.2d 380, 390 (Pa. Super. 2008) (citation omitted), rev’d on other grounds, 15 A.3d 333 (Pa. 2011). - 26 - J.A25037/15 In light of the foregoing, we reiterate: In an appellate brief, parties must provide an argument as to each question, which s | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.