extraordinary circumstances exception (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

extraordinary circumstances exception in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 2005–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Commonwealth v. Starrgreen
pa · 1995 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
2 sentences

2005See id. at 575-76 , 664 A.2d at 1332 . .

2005See id. at 575-76 , 664 A.2d at 1332 . .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Gingrich v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing green
pacommwct · 2016
2 sentences

2017OPINION BY JUDGE COHN JUBELIRER The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (PennDOT) appeals an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County (trial court) that sustained the statutory appeal of Vincent Gif-ford (Licensee) from a one-year suspension of his operating privilege imposed by PennDOT pursuant to Section 3733 of the Vehicle Code (Code), 75 Pa. C.S. § 3733. 1 Because the trial court did not err in holding that Licensee meets the extraordinary circumstances exception set forth in Gingrich v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of

2017This offense is defined to include: Knowingly or intentionally possessing a controlled or counterfeit substance by a person not registered under this act, or a practitioner not registered or licensed by not meet the extraordinary circumstances exception set forth in Gingrich v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 134 A.3d 528 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016), we reverse.

32016–2017
Cw v. Kaw green
pasuperct · 2001
1 sentence

2020Id. at 16 (citing Moorman v. -8- J-A18044-20 Tingle, 467 A.2d 359 (Pa. Super. 1983) and C.W. v. K.A.W., 774 A.2d 745 (Pa. Super. 2001)).

12020–2020
Moorman v. Tingle green
pa · 1984
1 sentence

2020Id. at 16 (citing Moorman v. -8- J-A18044-20 Tingle, 467 A.2d 359 (Pa. Super. 1983) and C.W. v. K.A.W., 774 A.2d 745 (Pa. Super. 2001)).

12020–2020
Rabenold v. Zoning Hearing Board green
pacommwct · 2001
1 sentence

2016Rabenold v. Zoning Hearing Bd., 777 A.2d 1257 , 1263 n.7 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001). 4 the ongoing applicability of the aforementioned general rule but recognizing an extraordinary circumstances exception thereto.

12016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

PA § 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1532 (3) PA § 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6323 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 43 (1988–2026) NJ 33 (1999–2025) PA 6 (2005–2020) DE 5 (1985–2026) WI 4 (1996–2024) NM 3 (2002–2012) UT 3 (1997–2023) MD 3 (1976–1985) ME 3 (1999–2014) WA 2 (1989–2019) AL 2 (1996–2012) TX 2 (2004–2018) CO 2 (2010–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check