granted an evidentiary hearing (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

granted an evidentiary hearing in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Commonwealth v. Weissgreen
pa · 2013 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Commonwealth v. Weiss, 81 A.3d 767, 783 (Pa. 2013).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Batson v. Kentucky green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

2014The seven issues to be considered at the evidentiary hearing were: (1) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to object to the trial court’s instruction on accomplice liability, (2) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to adequately investigate and present evidence on the cause of death, (3) a jury selection challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), (4) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to present mitigation evidence, (5) allegations related to appellate counsels’ performance, (6) a general request regarding the application of rela

2014The seven issues to be considered at the evidentiary hearing were: (1) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to object to the trial court’s instruction on accomplice liability, (2) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to adequately investigate and present evidence on the cause of death, (3) a jury selection challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), (4) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to present mitigation evidence, (5) allegations related to appellate counsels’ performance, (6) a general request regarding the application of rela

52009–2014
Commonwealth v. Lassiter green
pa · 1998
2 sentences

2014The seven issues to be considered at the evidentiary hearing were: (1) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to object to the trial court’s instruction on accomplice liability, (2) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to adequately investigate and present evidence on the cause of death, (3) a jury selection challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), (4) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to present mitigation evidence, (5) allegations related to appellate counsels’ performance, (6) a general request regarding the application of rela

2014The seven issues to be considered at the evidentiary hearing were: (1) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to object to the trial court’s instruction on accomplice liability, (2) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to adequately investigate and present evidence on the cause of death, (3) a jury selection challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), (4) trial counsel ineffectiveness for failing to present mitigation evidence, (5) allegations related to appellate counsels’ performance, (6) a general request regarding the application of rela

52009–2014
Strickland v. Washington green
scotus · 1984
1 sentence

2016Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Commonwealth v. Weiss, 81 A.3d 767, 783 (Pa. 2013).

12016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

PA § 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9711 (5) PA § 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 304 (4) PA § 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9543 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 6 (2009–2016) FL 4 (2003–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check