Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1980–1987 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. McCutchengreen2 sentences1987See Commonwealth v. Geschwendt, supra. Finally, the interested adult rule, as articulated in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975), requires that an accused under 18 years of age may not effectively waive his constitutional rights against self incrimination and the right to counsel without an opportunity to consult with an attorney or an adult, interested in the welfare of the juvenile suspect. 1987See Commonwealth v. Geschwendt, supra. Finally, the interested adult rule, as articulated in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975), requires that an accused under 18 years of age may not effectively waive his constitutional rights against self incrimination and the right to counsel without an opportunity to consult with an attorney or an adult, interested in the welfare of the juvenile suspect. | 1 | 5 |
Pennsylvania v. McCutchengreen2 sentences1987Finally, the interested adult rule, as articulated in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975), requires that *21 an accused under 18 years of age may not effectively waive his constitutional rights against self incrimination and the right to counsel without an opportunity to consult with an attorney or an adult, interested in the welfare of the juvenile suspect. 1987See Commonwealth v. Geschwendt, supra. Finally, the interested adult rule, as articulated in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975), requires that an accused under 18 years of age may not effectively waive his constitutional rights against self incrimination and the right to counsel without an opportunity to consult with an attorney or an adult, interested in the welfare of the juvenile suspect. | 1 | 4 |
Bombard v. Washingtongreen2 sentences1987Finally, the interested adult rule, as articulated in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975), requires that *21 an accused under 18 years of age may not effectively waive his constitutional rights against self incrimination and the right to counsel without an opportunity to consult with an attorney or an adult, interested in the welfare of the juvenile suspect. 1987See Commonwealth v. Geschwendt, supra. Finally, the interested adult rule, as articulated in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975), requires that an accused under 18 years of age may not effectively waive his constitutional rights against self incrimination and the right to counsel without an opportunity to consult with an attorney or an adult, interested in the welfare of the juvenile suspect. | 1 | 4 |
Commonwealth v. Barnesgreen2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Geschwendtgreen1 sentence1987See Commonwealth v. Geschwendt, supra. Finally, the interested adult rule, as articulated in Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975), requires that an accused under 18 years of age may not effectively waive his constitutional rights against self incrimination and the right to counsel without an opportunity to consult with an attorney or an adult, interested in the welfare of the juvenile suspect. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Carrgreen2 sentences1987Commonwealth v. Carr, 320 Superior Ct. 1, 7-8, 466 A.2d 1030, 1033-34 (1983) (Opinion by Cirillo, J., now P.J.). 1987Commonwealth v. Carr, 320 Superior Ct. 1, 7-8, 466 A.2d 1030, 1033-34 (1983) (Opinion by Cirillo, J., now P.J.). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Estate of Breyergreen1 sentence1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Roane
green
2 sentences1984The interested adult rule was established by our Supreme Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974); Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); and Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 (1975). 1984The interested adult rule was established by our Supreme Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974); Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); and Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 (1975). | 3 | 1980–1984 |
Commonwealth v. Starkes
green
2 sentences1984The interested adult rule was established by our Supreme Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974); Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); and Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 (1975). 1984The interested adult rule was established by our Supreme Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974); Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); and Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 (1975). | 3 | 1980–1984 |
Commonwealth v. Chaney
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 2 | 1980–1985 |
Johnson v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences1985While the U.S. Supreme Court and Pennsylvania Supreme Court have not ruled on the precise issue of retroactivity presented for our consideration in this case, in Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 , 86 S.Ct. 1772 , 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966) it held that the Escobedo and Miranda 4 decisions were to be applied prospectively only. 1985While the U.S. Supreme Court and Pennsylvania Supreme Court have not ruled on the precise issue of retroactivity presented for our consideration in this case, in Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 , 86 S.Ct. 1772 , 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966) it held that the Escobedo and Miranda 4 decisions were to be applied prospectively only. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Commonwealth v. Henderson
green
2 sentences1984The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has recently reinforced the holding of McCutchen and subsequent cases regarding the "interested adult rule.” In Commonwealth v. Henderson, 496 Pa. 349, 437 A.2d 387 (1981), the Court held that the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the federal constitution could not disturb the force of the Commonwealth’s interested adult rule which, as a matter of Pennsyl vania law, effects that police, seeking to subject juvenile suspects to custodial interrogation, are first required to provide the juvenile with the opportunity to consult with an adult interested in 1984The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has recently reinforced the holding of McCutchen and subsequent cases regarding the "interested adult rule.” In Commonwealth v. Henderson, 496 Pa. 349, 437 A.2d 387 (1981), the Court held that the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the federal constitution could not disturb the force of the Commonwealth’s interested adult rule which, as a matter of Pennsyl vania law, effects that police, seeking to subject juvenile suspects to custodial interrogation, are first required to provide the juvenile with the opportunity to consult with an adult interested in | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Commonwealth v. Wade
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Smith
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Hackett
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Smith
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Riggs
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Markle
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Thomas
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Hailey
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Lee
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Walker
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. McCloud
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Graver
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| Commonwealth v. Gaskins green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Stanton
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
In Re SEB
green
1 sentence1980B., 514 S.W.2d 948 (Tex.Civ.App.1974), follow the interested adult rule. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Lawson
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Webster
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Crenshaw
neutral
1 sentence1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Commonwealth v. Jamison
green
2 sentences1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common 1980Appellant John Veltre was deprived of an opportunity to consult with an interested adult in violation of the clear rule of this Court established in Commonwealth v. Roane, 459 Pa. 389 , 329 A.2d 286 (1974), and consistently followed in Commonwealth v. Starkes, 461 Pa. 178 , 335 A.2d 698 (1975); Commonwealth v. McCutchen, 463 Pa. 90 , 343 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1147 , 47 L.Ed.2d 341 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 465 Pa. 310 , 350 A.2d 410 (1976); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 465 Pa. 407 , 350 A.2d 829 (1975); Commonwealth v. Riggs, 465 Pa. 208 , 348 A.2d 429 (1975); Common | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.