Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Baneygreen2 sentences2025Commonwealth v. Baney, 860 A.2d 127, 129 (Pa. Super. 2004). 2017Moreover, our review of the record does not reveal any non-frivolous issues overlooked by counsel.7 See Flowers, ____________________________________________ 7 “When a pro se or counseled brief has been filed within a reasonable amount of time, … the Court should then consider the merits of the issues contained therein and rule upon them accordingly.” Commonwealth v. Baney, 860 A.2d 127, 129 (Pa. Super. 2004). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Bennett
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 333-34 . 2019Id. at 333-34 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Com. v. CHIKONYERA
green
2 sentences2015Id. (citation omitted). 2014Id. (citation omitted). | 2 | 2014–2015 |