item claim in Pennsylvania

1975Again, these expenses will not be treated as a separate item of claim but merely as additional living expenses. 3 Of course, we recognize that plaintiffs earning capacity of $180. per week must be taken into consideration and also that under present law plaintiff has an equal obligation with defendant to support the child: Travitzky v. Travitzky, 230 Pa. Superior Ct. 435 (1974).

1927The legal question involved as to the item of claim allowed for had previously been passed upon by the Superior' Court, and the right of a plaintiff, owning adjoining property and similarly situated, to recover for such loss determined: Miskel v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 357 .

1924This case bears a striking similarity to McFarland v. Schultz, 168 Pa. 634 , the claim in which was for work and labor done, to wit, ‘grading and digging lots and carting away dirt from the same. . . .

1901It will not be contended that a party may not refuse to claim interest if he does not choose to claim it, or that he may not omit to press an item of claim:" Evans v. Hall, 45 Pa. 235 .

1893On the other hand the recent cases of Commonwealth v. The Pennsylvania Co., referred to at page 411 of 137 Pa., and Fidelity Company v. Laughlin et al., at 139 Pa. 612 , are in harmony with the conclusions reached in this case.