Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1940–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Educationgreen2 sentences2006See, e.g., Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75, 87 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 899 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984) (remanding to District Court to apply Ohio claim preclusion law); Omega Leasing Corp. v. Movie Gallery, Inc., 859 So.2d 421, 424 (Ala.2003) (looking to Virginia law to determine if judgment was final); O'Connell v. Corcoran, 1 N.Y.3d 179 , 770 N.Y.S.2d 673, 676 , 802 N.E.2d 1071 (2003) (according preclusive effect to Vermont divorce decree based on Vermont's res judicata law); Jordache Enters., Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. 2006See, e.g., Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75, 87 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 899 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984) (remanding to District Court to apply Ohio claim preclusion law); Omega Leasing Corp. v. Movie Gallery, Inc., 859 So.2d 421, 424 (Ala.2003) (looking to Virginia law to determine if judgment was final); O'Connell v. Corcoran, 1 N.Y.3d 179 , 770 N.Y.S.2d 673, 676 , 802 N.E.2d 1071 (2003) (according preclusive effect to Vermont divorce decree based on Vermont's res judicata law); Jordache Enters., Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Omega Leasing Corp. v. Movie Gallery, Inc.green2 sentences2006See, e.g., Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75, 87 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 899 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984) (remanding to District Court to apply Ohio claim preclusion law); Omega Leasing Corp. v. Movie Gallery, Inc., 859 So.2d 421, 424 (Ala.2003) (looking to Virginia law to determine if judgment was final); O'Connell v. Corcoran, 1 N.Y.3d 179 , 770 N.Y.S.2d 673, 676 , 802 N.E.2d 1071 (2003) (according preclusive effect to Vermont divorce decree based on Vermont's res judicata law); Jordache Enters., Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. 2006See, e.g., Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75, 87 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 899 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984) (remanding to District Court to apply Ohio claim preclusion law); Omega Leasing Corp. v. Movie Gallery, Inc., 859 So.2d 421, 424 (Ala.2003) (looking to Virginia law to determine if judgment was final); O’Connell v. Corcoran, 1 N.Y.3d 179 , 770 N.Y.S.2d 673, 676 , 802 N.E.2d 1071 (2003) (according preclusive effect to Vermont divorce decree based on Vermont’s res judicata law); Jordache Enters., Inc. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurancegreen2 sentences2006Co., 204 W.Va. 465 , 513 S.E.2d 692, 703 (1998) ("the full faith and credit clause generally requires the courts of this State to give the New York judgment at least the res judicata effect which it would be accorded by the New York courts"); Smith v. Shelter Mut. 2006Co., 204 W.Va. 465 , 513 S.E.2d 692, 703 (1998) ("the full faith and credit clause generally requires the courts of this State to give the New York judgment at least the res judicata effect which it would be accorded by the New York courts"); Smith v. Shelter Mut. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Callowaygreen2 sentences1994See Department of Transportation, Bureau of TraffiC Safety v. Calloway, 60 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 647, 432 A.2d 322 (1981). 4 In the case sub judice, DOT provided uncontested evidence that Licensee paid the fine for the April 18, 1993 citation resulting in conviction for driving while her license was under suspension due to the Ohio violation. 1994See Department of Transportation, Bureau of TraffiC Safety v. Calloway, 60 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 647, 432 A.2d 322 (1981). 4 In the case sub judice, DOT provided uncontested evidence that Licensee paid the fine for the April 18, 1993 citation resulting in conviction for driving while her license was under suspension due to the Ohio violation. | 1 | 1 |
Costello v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1975See and compare Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Nasser v. Isthmian Lines, 331 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1964); Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1962); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169 (7th Cir. 1959). 1975See and compare Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Nasser v. Isthmian Lines, 331 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1964); Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1962); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169 (7th Cir. 1959). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mudano v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.
green
2 sentences2024Under Mudano v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 137 A. 104 (Pa. 1927), a plaintiff cannot introduce expert opinions from different medical - 16 - J-A28033-23 experts that irreconcilably conflict with each other, and if such an irreconcilable conflict exists, no verdict can be based on either expert, and the plaintiff’s claim based on such expert testimony fails. 2024Under Mudano v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 137 A. 104 (Pa. 1927), a plaintiff cannot introduce expert opinions from different medical - 16 - J-A28033-23 experts that irreconcilably conflict with each other, and if such an irreconcilable conflict exists, no verdict can be based on either expert, and the plaintiff’s claim based on such expert testimony fails. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
O'CONNELL v. Corcoran
green
2 sentences2006See, e.g., Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75, 87 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 899 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984) (remanding to District Court to apply Ohio claim preclusion law); Omega Leasing Corp. v. Movie Gallery, Inc., 859 So.2d 421, 424 (Ala.2003) (looking to Virginia law to determine if judgment was final); O'Connell v. Corcoran, 1 N.Y.3d 179 , 770 N.Y.S.2d 673, 676 , 802 N.E.2d 1071 (2003) (according preclusive effect to Vermont divorce decree based on Vermont's res judicata law); Jordache Enters., Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. 2006See, e.g., Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75, 87 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 899 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984) (remanding to District Court to apply Ohio claim preclusion law); Omega Leasing Corp. v. Movie Gallery, Inc., 859 So.2d 421, 424 (Ala.2003) (looking to Virginia law to determine if judgment was final); O'Connell v. Corcoran, 1 N.Y.3d 179 , 770 N.Y.S.2d 673, 676 , 802 N.E.2d 1071 (2003) (according preclusive effect to Vermont divorce decree based on Vermont's res judicata law); Jordache Enters., Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc.
green
2 sentences1980Pa. 1975) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over New Jersey defendant where only significant contact with Pennsylvania is that Pennsylvania residents brought a tractor to defendant for repair; Knapp v. Franklin Coach Co., 365 F.Supp. 305 (W.D.Pa.1973) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over Ohio defendant performing repairs on truck with Indiana license plates where truck is driven into Pennsylvania and has accident there); Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc., 113 Ariz. 485 , 557 P.2d 522 (1976) (Arizona has no jurisdiction over Indiana repair shop that repairs automobile that later breaks down in Ariz 1980Pa. 1975) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over New Jersey defendant where only significant contact with Pennsylvania is that Pennsylvania residents brought a tractor to defendant for repair; Knapp v. Franklin Coach Co., 365 F.Supp. 305 (W.D.Pa.1973) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over Ohio defendant performing repairs on truck with Indiana license plates where truck is driven into Pennsylvania and has accident there); Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc., 113 Ariz. 485 , 557 P.2d 522 (1976) (Arizona has no jurisdiction over Indiana repair shop that repairs automobile that later breaks down in Ariz | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Knapp v. FRANKLIN COACH COMPANY
green
2 sentences1980Pa. 1975) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over New Jersey defendant where only significant contact with Pennsylvania is that Pennsylvania residents brought a tractor to defendant for repair; Knapp v. Franklin Coach Co., 365 F.Supp. 305 (W.D.Pa. 1973) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over Ohio defendant performing repairs on truck with Indiana license plates where truck is driven into Pennsylvania and has accident there); Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc., 113 Ariz. 485 , 557 P.2d 522 (1976) (Arizona has no jurisdiction over Indiana repair shop that repairs automobile that later breaks down in Ari 1980Pa. 1975) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over New Jersey defendant where only significant contact with Pennsylvania is that Pennsylvania residents brought a tractor to defendant for repair; Knapp v. Franklin Coach Co., 365 F.Supp. 305 (W.D.Pa.1973) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over Ohio defendant performing repairs on truck with Indiana license plates where truck is driven into Pennsylvania and has accident there); Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc., 113 Ariz. 485 , 557 P.2d 522 (1976) (Arizona has no jurisdiction over Indiana repair shop that repairs automobile that later breaks down in Ariz | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Bev-Mark, Inc. v. Summerfield GMC Truck Co.
green
2 sentences1980Pa. 1975) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over New Jersey defendant where only significant contact with Pennsylvania is that Pennsylvania residents brought a tractor to defendant for repair; Knapp v. Franklin Coach Co., 365 F.Supp. 305 (W.D.Pa.1973) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over Ohio defendant performing repairs on truck with Indiana license plates where truck is driven into Pennsylvania and has accident there); Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc., 113 Ariz. 485 , 557 P.2d 522 (1976) (Arizona has no jurisdiction over Indiana repair shop that repairs automobile that later breaks down in Ariz 1980Pa. 1975) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over New Jersey defendant where only significant contact with Pennsylvania is that Pennsylvania residents brought a tractor to defendant for repair; Knapp v. Franklin Coach Co., 365 F.Supp. 305 (W.D.Pa.1973) (Pennsylvania has no jurisdiction over Ohio defendant performing repairs on truck with Indiana license plates where truck is driven into Pennsylvania and has accident there); Maloof v. Raper Sales, Inc., 113 Ariz. 485 , 557 P.2d 522 (1976) (Arizona has no jurisdiction over Indiana repair shop that repairs automobile that later breaks down in Ariz | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Madden v. Perry
green
2 sentences1975See and compare Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Nasser v. Isthmian Lines, 331 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1964); Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1962); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169 (7th Cir. 1959). 1975See and compare Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Nasser v. Isthmian Lines, 331 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1964); Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1962); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169 (7th Cir. 1959). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Kern v. Hettinger
green
2 sentences1975See and compare Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Nasser v. Isthmian Lines, 331 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1964); Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1962); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169 (7th Cir. 1959). 1975See and compare Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Nasser v. Isthmian Lines, 331 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1964); Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1962); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169 (7th Cir. 1959). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Mohammed Nasser v. Isthmian Lines
green
2 sentences1975See and compare Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Nasser v. Isthmian Lines, 331 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1964); Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1962); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169 (7th Cir. 1959). 1975See and compare Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Nasser v. Isthmian Lines, 331 F.2d 124 (2d Cir. 1964); Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1962); Madden v. Perry, 264 F.2d 169 (7th Cir. 1959). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
People v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1940Cases illustrative of this view are the following: Childs v Smeltzer, 315 Pa., 9 ; 171 Atl. 883 , (obiter dicta); People v Title Guaranty & Trust Co., 227 N. Y. 366 , 125 N. E. 666 , (obiter dicta). 1940Cases illustrative of this view are the following: Childs v Smeltzer, 315 Pa., 9 ; 171 Atl. 883 , (obiter dicta); People v Title Guaranty & Trust Co., 227 N. Y. 366 , 125 N. E. 666 , (obiter dicta). | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Childs v. Smeltzer
green
2 sentences1940Cases illustrative of this view are the following: Childs v Smeltzer, 315 Pa., 9 ; 171 Atl. 883 , (obiter dicta); People v Title Guaranty & Trust Co., 227 N. Y. 366 , 125 N. E. 666 , (obiter dicta). 1940Cases illustrative of this view are the following: Childs v Smeltzer, 315 Pa., 9 ; 171 Atl. 883 , (obiter dicta); People v Title Guaranty & Trust Co., 227 N. Y. 366 , 125 N. E. 666 , (obiter dicta). | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.