Process Gas standard (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

Process Gas standard in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Pa. Pub. Util. Com'n v. Proc. Gas Consum.green
pa · 1983 · cited in 4 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1983–2024
2 sentences

1983See Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers Group, *380 502 Pa. at 808-09 , 467 A.2d at 808 -09 (citing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841 [D.C.Cir.1977] and Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, 259 F.2d 921 [D.C.Cir.1958]). [8] We are convinced that appellee failed to satisfy the Process Gas standard and, therefore, Commonwealth Court abused its discretion in granting the stay.

1983See Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers Group, *380 502 Pa. at 808-09 , 467 A.2d at 808 -09 (citing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841 [D.C.Cir.1977] and Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, 259 F.2d 921 [D.C.Cir.1958]). [8] We are convinced that appellee failed to satisfy the Process Gas standard and, therefore, Commonwealth Court abused its discretion in granting the stay.

34
Commonwealth v. Morrisgreen
pa · 2001 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003See also Morris I, 771 A.2d at 746 (Castille, J., concurring) (discussing Process Gas standard).

2003See also Morris I, 771 A.2d at 746 (Castille, J., concurring) (discussing Process Gas standard).

11
cluster 246242green
cadc · 1958 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers Group, *380 502 Pa. at 808-09 , 467 A.2d at 808 -09 (citing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841 [D.C.Cir.1977] and Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, 259 F.2d 921 [D.C.Cir.1958]). [8] We are convinced that appellee failed to satisfy the Process Gas standard and, therefore, Commonwealth Court abused its discretion in granting the stay.

1983See Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers Group, *380 502 Pa. at 808-09 , 467 A.2d at 808 -09 (citing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841 [D.C.Cir.1977] and Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, 259 F.2d 921 [D.C.Cir.1958]). [8] We are convinced that appellee failed to satisfy the Process Gas standard and, therefore, Commonwealth Court abused its discretion in granting the stay.

11
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.green
cadc · 1977 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers Group, *380 502 Pa. at 808-09 , 467 A.2d at 808 -09 (citing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841 [D.C.Cir.1977] and Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, 259 F.2d 921 [D.C.Cir.1958]). [8] We are convinced that appellee failed to satisfy the Process Gas standard and, therefore, Commonwealth Court abused its discretion in granting the stay.

1983See Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers Group, *380 502 Pa. at 808-09 , 467 A.2d at 808 -09 (citing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d 841 [D.C.Cir.1977] and Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, 259 F.2d 921 [D.C.Cir.1958]). [8] We are convinced that appellee failed to satisfy the Process Gas standard and, therefore, Commonwealth Court abused its discretion in granting the stay.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Dincer v. Dincer green
pa · 1997
1 sentence

2015See Prol, 840 A.2d at n.3 (applying Process Gas standard in application for stay of disposition of marital assets); Dincer v. Dincer, 666 A.2d at 287 (Pa. Super. 1995), rev’d on other grounds, 701 A.2d 210 (Pa. 1997).

12015–2015
Tyler v. Cain green
scotus · 2001
2 sentences

2003I also do not agree with the Majority in simply accepting appellant's characterization of Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656 , 121 S.Ct. 2478 , 150 L.Ed.2d 632 (2001).

2003I also do not agree with the Majority in simply accepting appellant's characterization of Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656 , 121 S.Ct. 2478 , 150 L.Ed.2d 632 (2001).

12003–2003
United Steelworkers v. United States green
scotus · 1959
2 sentences

1990Thus, with these proscriptions in mind this Court will be guided in its determination by cogent words of wisdom from Mr. Justice Douglas in his dissenting opinion in United Steelworkers v. United States, 361 U.S. 39, 62-63 , 80 S.Ct. 1, 4-5 , 4 L.Ed.2d 12 (1959), that “[w]e need, therefore, to stick closely to the letter of the law we enforce in order to keep this controversy from being shaped by the intense interest which the public rightfully has in it.” II To support the first prong of the Process Gas analysis, TAUP vehemently argues that it will prevail on the merits of its appeal before t

1990Thus, with these proscriptions in mind this Court will be guided in its determination by cogent words of wisdom from Mr. Justice Douglas in his dissenting opinion in United Steelworkers v. United States, 361 U.S. 39, 62-63 , 80 S.Ct. 1, 4-5 , 4 L.Ed.2d 12 (1959), that “[w]e need, therefore, to stick closely to the letter of the law we enforce in order to keep this controversy from being shaped by the intense interest which the public rightfully has in it.” II To support the first prong of the Process Gas analysis, TAUP vehemently argues that it will prevail on the merits of its appeal before t

11990–1990

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check