recited factors in Pennsylvania

2015Where there was an outright repudiation [of the contract], ... the statute of limitations [begins] to run at that point.” Id. at 682 .

2003The Wilkes-Barre decision merely acknowledges that various factors have been used by the Commission in allocating costs and the Commission is 'not limited to any fixed rule, but may consider any one or more of the above recited factors, depending upon the facts peculiar to each case.’ Id., slip op. at 4 (emphasis in original).

2003This principle has been also accepted by this Court.” 672 A.2d at 354 .

2001As noted above, in Commonwealth v. Strickler, 563 Pa. 47 , 757 A.2d 884 (2000), our Supreme Court reiterated the long established differences in the types of encounters between police officers and the citizenry.

2001As noted above, in Commonwealth v. Strickler, 563 Pa. 47 , 757 A.2d 884 (2000), our Supreme Court reiterated the long established differences in the types of encounters between police officers and the citizenry.

1995The Wilkes-Barre decision merely acknowledges that various factors have been used by the Commission in allocating costs and the Commission is “not limited to any fixed rule, but may consider any one or more of the above recited factors, depending upon the facts peculiar to each case.” Id., slip op. at 4 (emphasis in original).

1981The Supreme Court’s opinion mentions these particular factors only in describing the evidentiary information available to the expert in Feldman v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., 382 F. Supp. 1271 (D.

1956We are of the opinion that, in that case, the doctrine of Mercantile Library Co. of Philadelphia v. Fidelity Trust Co., 235 Pa. 5, 13 , ought to apply that: “The covenant must be understood to apply to the physical conditions then existing on the ground.” In the face of the legions of cases to the contrary, we cannot interpret the above statement to mean that defendant must leave his property in the state in which it was when the easement was granted.