6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1894–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Jemison Jr., D., Aplt.green1 sentence2025See Jemison, 98 A.3d at 1263 . | 1 | 1 |
Curtis Building Co. v. Tunstallgreen2 sentences1976See Curtis Building Co., Inc. v. Tunstall, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 81 , 343 A.2d 389 *214 (1975); Wheatcroft v. Schmid, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 301 A.2d 377 (1973). 1976See Curtis Building Co., Inc. v. Tunstall, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 81 , 343 A.2d 389 *214 (1975); Wheatcroft v. Schmid, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 301 A.2d 377 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Merigan v. McGonigle
green
2 sentences1952This money should have been awarded to the appellant.” In Merigan v. McGonigle, 205 Pa. 321 , 54 A. 994 , the Court sustained another such trust, saying through Justice Mestrezat, at p. 327: “Betention of the pass book by the depositor is not, under the circumstances here, decisive against the validity of the trust: Martin v. Funk (N. Y.), 31 Am. 1908Upon the face of the bank book, the money belonged to Polly McKim, and there is not sufficient upon the record to rebut this presumption.” In the recent case of Merigan v. McGonigle, 205 Pa. 321 , a depositor who had one account in her own name, opened another in the same bank in her name as trustee of her foster daughter. | 2 | 1908–1952 |
Wheatcroft v. Schmid
green
2 sentences1976See Curtis Building Co., Inc. v. Tunstall, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 81 , 343 A.2d 389 *214 (1975); Wheatcroft v. Schmid, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 301 A.2d 377 (1973). 1976See Curtis Building Co., Inc. v. Tunstall, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 81 , 343 A.2d 389 *214 (1975); Wheatcroft v. Schmid, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 301 A.2d 377 (1973). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Wilson v. Cochran
neutral
1 sentence1915In such cases, the purchaser is presumed to receive compensation in the collateral benefits of a bargain and equity will refuse relief : Perkins v. Gay, 3 S. & R. 327; Lighty v. Shorb, 3 P. & W. 447; Wilson v. Cochran, 48 Pa. 107 ; Lazarus v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co., 246 Pa. 178 . | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Lazarus v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.
green
1 sentence1915In such cases, the purchaser is presumed to receive compensation in the collateral benefits of a bargain and equity will refuse relief : Perkins v. Gay, 3 S. & R. 327; Lighty v. Shorb, 3 P. & W. 447; Wilson v. Cochran, 48 Pa. 107 ; Lazarus v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co., 246 Pa. 178 . | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Conlyn v. Parker ex rel. Watts
neutral
1 sentence1894These general principles are not questioned, as indeed they could not be in view of the settled line of authorities coming down as late as Conlyn v. Parker, 113 Pa. 29 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.