Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1902–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
House v. Stategreen1 sentence1996As cited above, “a petitioner is bound by the action or inaction of his attorney.” House v. State, 911 S.W.2d 705, 714 (Tenn.1995). | 1 | 1 |
Arthur v. Stategreen1 sentence1978See Arthur v. State, 483 S.W.2d 95 , (Tenn.1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ross
green
1 sentence2013Given the presumption of possession of substances by one who possesses the premises, see Ross, 49 S.W.3d at 846 , and the lack of evidence in the record to rebut that presumption, we conclude that sufficient evidence existed for a jury to find the possession component of these convictions. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Nesbit
green
2 sentences2001It is a well-established presumption in law that jurors are deemed to have followed the instructions given by the court, Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d at 894 , and we see no evidence from the record to rebut this presumption. 2001It is a well-established presumption in law that jurors are deemed to have followed the instructions given by the court, Nesbit, 978 S.W.2d at 894 , and we see no evidence from the record to rebut this presumption. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Patterson v. Patterson
neutral
2 sentences1902While a bill of exceptions may be properly made up at any time during the term, if there be no rule or order to the contrary in the court in which the case was tried (Patterson v. Patterson, 89 Tenn., 151 , 14 S. W., 485 ), yet a party is not entitled as a matter of right to the whole of the term in which to present it. 1902While a bill of exceptions may be properly made up at any time during the term, if there be no rule or order to the contrary in the court in which the case was tried (Patterson v. Patterson, 89 Tenn., 151 , 14 S. W., 485 ), yet a party is not entitled as a matter of right to the whole of the term in which to present it. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.