Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1972–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ross v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Ross, 133 S.W.3d at 624 . 2008See Ross, 133 S.W.3d at 624 . | 2 | 2 |
Alzarka v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Alzarka v. State , 90 S.W.3d 321, 324 (Tex. Crim. 2005See Alzarka v. State , 90 S.W.3d 321, 324 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Luquis v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See Luquis, 72 S.W.3d at 366, 368 . 2004See Luquis , 72 S.W.3d at 366, 368 . | 2 | 2 |
Oldham v. Stategreen2 sentences2002Oldham v. State , 977 S.W.2d 354, 363 (Tex. Crim. 2002Oldham v. State, 977 S.W.2d 354, 363 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
General Electric Co. v. Falcon Ridge Apartments, Joint Venturegreen2 sentences2002See Falcon Ridge , 811 S.W.2d at 944 . 2002See Falcon Ridge, 811 S.W.2d at 944 . | 2 | 2 |
Galloway v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See Galloway v. State, 716 S.W.2d 556, 557 (Tex. App.—Waco 1986, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
Castillo v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Because we have already concluded that there is no evidence in the record to rebut the presumption that appellant rejected the option of filing a motion for new trial, the record is insufficient to show trial counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness because counsel did not file a motion for new trial.9 See Hudson v. State, 128 S.W.3d 367, 381 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2004, no pet.) (where nothing in record rebutted presumption that defendant was adequately counseled regarding motion for new trial and rejected that option, defendant could not prevail on claim his cou | 1 | 1 |
Landers v. Stategreen1 sentence2023See Landers v. State, 110 S.W.3d 617, 625 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
Kane v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Appellant next argues that his trial counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness because counsel did not “withdraw as counsel of record immediately after [appellant’s] sentence was pronounced so that the trial court would be able to appoint new counsel and new counsel would have [had a] full thirty[-]day time period.” Notably, because we have already concluded that there is no evidence in the record to rebut the presumption that appellant was adequately represented by his trial counsel during the motion-for-new-trial stage, the record is also insufficient to show t | 1 | 1 |
Hudson v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Because we have already concluded that there is no evidence in the record to rebut the presumption that appellant rejected the option of filing a motion for new trial, the record is insufficient to show trial counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness because counsel did not file a motion for new trial.9 See Hudson v. State, 128 S.W.3d 367, 381 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2004, no pet.) (where nothing in record rebutted presumption that defendant was adequately counseled regarding motion for new trial and rejected that option, defendant could not prevail on claim his cou | 1 | 1 |
Osborn v. Osborngreen2 sentences2016See id. (citing Osborn, 961 S.W.2d at 411 ). 2016See id. (citing Osborn, 961 S.W.2d at 411 ). | 1 | 1 |
Colburn v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Colburn, 966 S.W.2d at 520 . | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2010See Strickland , 466 U.S. at 688 ; Garza , 213 S.W.3d at 347 . | 1 | 1 |
Bell v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See Bell , 90 S.W.3d at 307 . | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See Williams v. State, 937 S.W.2d 479, 490 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996); Gardner v. State, 730 S.W.2d 675, 696 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (setting out jury presumed to follow instruction to disregard evidence); Lopez v. State, 664 S.W.2d 815, 817 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1984, no pet.) (providing jury presumed to obey instruction to disregard improper testimony). | 1 | 1 |
Lopez v. Texasgreen1 sentence2005See Williams v. State, 937 S.W.2d 479, 490 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996); Gardner v. State, 730 S.W.2d 675, 696 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (setting out jury presumed to follow instruction to disregard evidence); Lopez v. State, 664 S.W.2d 815, 817 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1984, no pet.) (providing jury presumed to obey instruction to disregard improper testimony). | 1 | 1 |
Gardner v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See Williams v. State, 937 S.W.2d 479, 490 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996); Gardner v. State, 730 S.W.2d 675, 696 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (setting out jury presumed to follow instruction to disregard evidence); Lopez v. State, 664 S.W.2d 815, 817 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1984, no pet.) (providing jury presumed to obey instruction to disregard improper testimony). | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Stategreen1 sentence1972See Martin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 463 S.W.2d 449 ; Landrum v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 914 ; Mullenix v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 443 S.W.2d 264 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Garza v. State
green
1 sentence2010See Strickland , 466 U.S. at 688 ; Garza , 213 S.W.3d at 347 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Gray v. State
green
1 sentence2009We note the similarity of this case to that of Gray , 257 S.W.3d 825 , wherein we determined that there was no evidence in the record to rebut the presumption of competence such that the trial court would have been required to make further inquiry into the defendant's competence. 8. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Landrum v. State
green
1 sentence1972See Martin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 463 S.W.2d 449 ; Landrum v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 914 ; Mullenix v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 443 S.W.2d 264 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Mullenix v. State
green
1 sentence1972See Martin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 463 S.W.2d 449 ; Landrum v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 914 ; Mullenix v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 443 S.W.2d 264 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.