strategic error (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

strategic error in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Commonwealth v. Boydgreen
pa · 1975 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1985–2025
2 sentences

2025“Where an appellant merely claims . . . that his decision was a strategic error, and can point to no specific incidents of counsel impropriety, he must bear the responsibility for that decision and cannot shift the blame to counsel.” Boyd, 334 A.2d at 617 (internal citation omitted).

2019See, Commonwealth v. Boyd[,] 334 A.2d 610, 617 (Pa. 1975).

23
Commonwealth v. Martingreen
pa · 1985 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020Commonwealth v. Martin, 499 A.2d 344, 351 (Pa. Super. 1985) (citations omitted).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Commonwealth v. Stokes green
pa · 1973
2 sentences

2023“Where an appellant merely claims, as in the present case, that his decision was a strategic error, and can point to no specific incidents of counsel impropriety, he must bear the responsibility for that decision and cannot shift the blame to counsel.” Id.

1985Id. 461 Pa. at 30 , 334 A.2d at 617 .

21985–2023
Commonwealth v. Brown green
pasuperct · 1984
2 sentences

2025In Commonwealth v. Brown, 477 A.2d 1364 (Pa. Super. 1984), Ernest Brown (“Brown”) argued that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by “failing to request recusal of the trial judge since the trial judge ruled against [Brown] at the suppression hearing and was aware that [Brown] had initially intended to plead guilty.” Id. at 1367 .

2025In Commonwealth v. Brown, 477 A.2d 1364 (Pa. Super. 1984), Ernest Brown (“Brown”) argued that his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by “failing to request recusal of the trial judge since the trial judge ruled against [Brown] at the suppression hearing and was aware that [Brown] had initially intended to plead guilty.” Id. at 1367 .

12025–2025
Devine v. Hutt green
pasuperct · 2004
1 sentence

2017This Court applied Harber in the context of a statute of limitations defense in Devine v. Hutt, 863 A.2d 1160 (Pa. Super. 2004).

12017–2017

Where else courts name it

WI 6 (1968–2004) PA 6 (1985–2025) NM 3 (2013–2014) MD 3 (2011–2015) MO 2 (2011–2023) AZ 2 (2009–2009) MA 2 (2018–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check