Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1977–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commissiongreen2 sentences1996In Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Uniontown Area School District, 455 Pa. 52, 76-78 , 313 A.2d 156, 169 (1973), our Supreme Court explained: There is a well-recognized distinction in the law of administrative agencies between the authority of a rule adopted by an agency pursuant to what is denominated by the textwriters as legislative rule-making power and the authority for a rule adopted pursuant to interpretative rule-making power. 1996In Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Uniontown Area School District, 455 Pa. 52, 76-78 , 313 A.2d 156, 169 (1973), our Supreme Court explained: There is a well-recognized distinction in the law of administrative agencies between the authority of a rule adopted by an agency pursuant to what is denominated by the textwriters as legislative rule-making power and the authority for a rule adopted pursuant to interpretative rule-making power. | 4 | 6 |
Chambers Development Co. v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence1994In the case of Chambers Development Co., Inc. v. Department of Environmental Resources, 118 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 97, 104-05, 545 A.2d 404, 407-08 (1988) (quoting Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 455 Pa. 52, 76-78 , 313 A.2d 156 -169 (1973)), the court said: There is a well-recognized distinction in the law of administrative agencies between the authority of a rule adopted by the agency pursuant to what is denominated by the textwriters as legislative rule-making power and the authority of a rule adopted pursuant to interpretative rule-making power. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||