Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2022 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Gumpertgreen2 sentences2022See id.; see also Commonwealth v. Pi Delta Psi, Inc., 211 A.3d 875, 884 (Pa. Super. 2019) (stating “issues, even those of constitutional dimension, are waived if not raised in the trial court.”); Commonwealth v. Gumpert, 512 A.2d 699, 703 (Pa. Super. 1986) (providing that the validity of a jury waiver is subject to principles of waiver on appeal). - 10 - J-S27027-22 We note, however, that the trial court explained that even if Appellant had preserved this issue, she is entitled to no relief as her jury trial waiver was knowing and voluntary. 2022See Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) (issues not raised before the trial court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); Commonwealth v. Cline, 177 A.3d 922, 927 (Pa. Super 2017) (constitutional challenges not raised before the trial court are waived); Commonwealth v. Gumpert, 512 A.2d 699, 703 (Pa. Super. 1986) (the validity of a jury waiver is subject to principles of waiver on appeal). | 5 | 5 |
Commonwealth v. Pi Delta Psi, Inc.green2 sentences2022See id.; see also Commonwealth v. Pi Delta Psi, Inc., 211 A.3d 875, 884 (Pa. Super. 2019) (stating “issues, even those of constitutional dimension, are waived if not raised in the trial court.”); Commonwealth v. Gumpert, 512 A.2d 699, 703 (Pa. Super. 1986) (providing that the validity of a jury waiver is subject to principles of waiver on appeal). - 10 - J-S27027-22 We note, however, that the trial court explained that even if Appellant had preserved this issue, she is entitled to no relief as her jury trial waiver was knowing and voluntary. 2022See id.; see also Commonwealth v. Pi Delta Psi, Inc., 211 A.3d 875, 884 (Pa. Super. 2019) (stating “issues, even those of constitutional dimension, are waived if not raised in the trial court” (citation omitted)); Commonwealth v. Gumpert, 512 A.2d 699, 703 (Pa. Super. 1986) (providing that the validity of a jury waiver is subject to principles of waiver on appeal). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Clinegreen1 sentence2022See Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) (issues not raised before the trial court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal); Commonwealth v. Cline, 177 A.3d 922, 927 (Pa. Super 2017) (constitutional challenges not raised before the trial court are waived); Commonwealth v. Gumpert, 512 A.2d 699, 703 (Pa. Super. 1986) (the validity of a jury waiver is subject to principles of waiver on appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Hooksgreen2 sentences2008O'Donnell, 740 A.2d at 208 (rejecting a challenge to the validity of a jury waiver because the defendant failed to demonstrate whether her waiver was unknowing and unintelligent); see also Commonwealth v. Hooks, 483 Pa. 40 , 394 A.2d 528, 532 (1978) (stating that it is the defendant's burden to prove the infirmity of an otherwise valid waiver). 2008O'Donnell, 740 A.2d at 208 (rejecting a challenge to the validity of a jury waiver because the defendant failed to demonstrate whether her waiver was unknowing and unintelligent); see also Commonwealth v. Hooks, 483 Pa. 40 , 394 A.2d 528, 532 (1978) (stating that it is the defendant's burden to prove the infirmity of an otherwise valid waiver). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. O'Donnellgreen2 sentences2008O'Donnell, 740 A.2d at 208 (rejecting a challenge to the validity of a jury waiver because the defendant failed to demonstrate whether her waiver was unknowing and unintelligent); see also Commonwealth v. Hooks, 483 Pa. 40 , 394 A.2d 528, 532 (1978) (stating that it is the defendant's burden to prove the infirmity of an otherwise valid waiver). 2008O’Donnell, 740 A.2d at 208 (rejecting a challenge to the validity of a jury waiver because the defendant failed to demonstrate whether her waiver was unknowing and unintelligent); see also Commonwealth v. Hooks, 483 Pa. 40 , 394 A.2d 528, 532 (1978) (stating that it is the defendant’s burden to prove the infirmity of an otherwise valid waiver). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.