Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Guerragreen2 sentences2014See State v. Guerra, 12 A.3d 759, 765 (R.I.2011) (stating that if, after conducting the required three-step analysis, the trial justice agrees with the jury’s verdict, “then the inquiry is at an end and the motion for a new trial should be denied”). 2014See Guerra, 12 A.3d at 765 (stating that if, after conducting the required three-step analysis, the trial justice agrees with the jury’s verdict, “then the inquiry is at an end and the motion for a new trial should be denied”). | 4 | 4 |
State v. Bunnellgreen2 sentences2014See Guerra, 12 A.3d at 765 (stating that if, after conducting the required three-step analysis, the trial justice agrees with the jury’s verdict, “then the inquiry is at an end and the motion for a new trial should be denied”); see also State v. Bunnell, 47 A.3d 220, 232 (R.I.2012). 2014Upon concluding his analysis, the trial justice stated: “[The] verdicts were well supported by the testimony, and I am easily satisfied that John Silva is guilty as the verdicts reflect and his guilt was proved beyond all reasonable doubt on all counts.” That determination is a significant consideration in this Court’s review of a denial of a motion for new trial; we have consistently held that, if after conducting the required three-step analysis the trial justice agrees with the jury’s verdict, “then the inquiry is at an end and the motion for a new trial should be denied.” State v. Guerra, | 2 | 2 |
State v. Donald Greenslitgreen1 sentence2021See Greenslit, 135 A.3d at 1200 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jose Lopezgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Lopez, 129 A.3d 77, 84 (R.I. 2016); Gonzalez, 56 A.3d at 104 ; Adefusika, 989 A.2d at 480 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Herediagreen1 sentence2014Upon concluding his analysis, the trial justice stated: “[The] verdicts were well supported by the testimony, and I am easily satisfied that John Silva is guilty as the verdicts reflect and his guilt was proved beyond all reasonable doubt on all counts.” That determination is a significant consideration in this Court’s review of a denial of a motion for new trial; we have consistently held that, if after conducting the required three-step analysis the trial justice agrees with the jury’s verdict, “then the inquiry is at an end and the motion for a new trial should be denied.” State v. Guerra, | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rosariogreen1 sentence2014See Rosario, 35 A.3d at 947 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Adefusika
green
1 sentence2017See State v. Lopez, 129 A.3d 77, 84 (R.I. 2016); Gonzalez, 56 A.3d at 104 ; Adefusika, 989 A.2d at 480 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. José Gonzalez
green
1 sentence2017See State v. Lopez, 129 A.3d 77, 84 (R.I. 2016); Gonzalez, 56 A.3d at 104 ; Adefusika, 989 A.2d at 480 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.