Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dawn L. Huntley v. State of Rhode Islandgreen2 sentences2026“The doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action.” Town of Warren v. Bristol Warren Regional School District, 159 A.3d 1029, 1036 (R.I. 2017) (quoting Huntley v. State, 63 A.3d 526, 531 (R.I. 2013)). 2018As this Court has often stated, the doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that "were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action." Huntley v. State , 63 A.3d 526 , 531 (R.I. 2013) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Bossian v. Anderson , 991 A.2d 1025 , 1027 (R.I. 2010) (same); Carrozza v. Voccola , 962 A.2d 73 , 78 (R.I. 2009) (same); Ouimette v. State , 785 A.2d 1132 , 1138 (R.I. 2001) (" Res judicata bars the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding, even if the particular issue was not rais | 4 | 4 |
Bossian v. Andersongreen2 sentences2018As this Court has often stated, the doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that “were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action.” Huntley v. State, 63 A.3d 526, 531 (R.I. 2013) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Bossian v. Anderson, 991 A.2d 1025, 1027 (R.I. 2010) (same); Carrozza v. Voccola, 962 A.2d 73, 78 (R.I. 2009) (same); Ouimette v. State, 785 A.2d 1132, 1138 (R.I. 2001) (“Res judicata bars the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding, even if the particular issue was not raised.”). 1 2018As this Court has often stated, the doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that "were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action." Huntley v. State , 63 A.3d 526 , 531 (R.I. 2013) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Bossian v. Anderson , 991 A.2d 1025 , 1027 (R.I. 2010) (same); Carrozza v. Voccola , 962 A.2d 73 , 78 (R.I. 2009) (same); Ouimette v. State , 785 A.2d 1132 , 1138 (R.I. 2001) (" Res judicata bars the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding, even if the particular issue was not rais | 3 | 3 |
Carrozza v. Voccolagreen2 sentences2018As this Court has often stated, the doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that “were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action.” Huntley v. State, 63 A.3d 526, 531 (R.I. 2013) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Bossian v. Anderson, 991 A.2d 1025, 1027 (R.I. 2010) (same); Carrozza v. Voccola, 962 A.2d 73, 78 (R.I. 2009) (same); Ouimette v. State, 785 A.2d 1132, 1138 (R.I. 2001) (“Res judicata bars the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding, even if the particular issue was not raised.”). 1 2018As this Court has often stated, the doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that "were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action." Huntley v. State , 63 A.3d 526 , 531 (R.I. 2013) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Bossian v. Anderson , 991 A.2d 1025 , 1027 (R.I. 2010) (same); Carrozza v. Voccola , 962 A.2d 73 , 78 (R.I. 2009) (same); Ouimette v. State , 785 A.2d 1132 , 1138 (R.I. 2001) (" Res judicata bars the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding, even if the particular issue was not rais | 2 | 2 |
Town of Warren v. Bristol Warren Regional School District and Town of Bristol by and through its Town Council and its Town Treasurer, Julie Goucher, As Interested Party.green1 sentence2026“The doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action.” Town of Warren v. Bristol Warren Regional School District, 159 A.3d 1029, 1036 (R.I. 2017) (quoting Huntley v. State, 63 A.3d 526, 531 (R.I. 2013)). | 1 | 1 |
Ouimette v. Stategreen2 sentences2018As this Court has often stated, the doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that “were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action.” Huntley v. State, 63 A.3d 526, 531 (R.I. 2013) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Bossian v. Anderson, 991 A.2d 1025, 1027 (R.I. 2010) (same); Carrozza v. Voccola, 962 A.2d 73, 78 (R.I. 2009) (same); Ouimette v. State, 785 A.2d 1132, 1138 (R.I. 2001) (“Res judicata bars the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding, even if the particular issue was not raised.”). 1 2018As this Court has often stated, the doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that "were tried or might have been tried in an earlier action." Huntley v. State , 63 A.3d 526 , 531 (R.I. 2013) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Bossian v. Anderson , 991 A.2d 1025 , 1027 (R.I. 2010) (same); Carrozza v. Voccola , 962 A.2d 73 , 78 (R.I. 2009) (same); Ouimette v. State , 785 A.2d 1132 , 1138 (R.I. 2001) (" Res judicata bars the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding, even if the particular issue was not rais | 1 | 1 |
Torrado Architects v. Rhode Island Department of Human Servicesgreen1 sentence2015“The doctrine of res judicata bars the relitigation of all issues that ‘were tried or might have been tried ’ in an earlier action.” Torrado Architects v. Rhode Island Department of Human Services, 102 A.3d 655, 658 (R.I.2014) (quoting Huntley v. State, 63 A.3d 526, 531 (R.I. 2013)). | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Wallgreen1 sentence2014See Taylor v. Wall, 821 A.2d 685, 688 (R.I. 2003) ("Res judicata bars the relitigation of any issue that could have been litigated in a prior proceeding, including a direct appeal, that resulted in a final judgment between the same parties, or those in privity with them.”). 4 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.