Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Yates v. Evatt
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 404 , 111 S.Ct. 1884 . 1993Secondly, [we] must weigh the probative force of the evidence against the probative force of the presumption standing alone.” Id. — S.C. at —, 420 S.E. (2d) at 839 (quoting Yates v. Evatt, 500 U.S. —, —, 111 S.Ct. 1884, 1893 , 114 L.Ed. (2d) 432, 448-49 (1991)). | 3 | 1992–2008 |
Taylor v. State
green
2 sentences2007Following Arnold, the court applied this bifurcated analysis in Taylor v. State and reversed the defendant’s conviction for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and marijuana. 312 S.C. at 183 , 439 S.E.2d at 822 . 2007Following Arnold, the court applied this bifurcated analysis in Taylor v. State and reversed the defendant’s conviction for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and marijuana. 312 S.C. at 183 , 439 S.E.2d at 822 . | 2 | 1996–2007 |
Arnold v. State
green
2 sentences2002Arnold v. State, 309 S.C. 157 , 420 S.E.2d 834 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 927 , 113 S.Ct. 1302 , 122 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993). 1993Secondly, [we] must weigh the probative force of the evidence against the probative force of the presumption standing alone.” Id. — S.C. at —, 420 S.E. (2d) at 839 (quoting Yates v. Evatt, 500 U.S. —, —, 111 S.Ct. 1884, 1893 , 114 L.Ed. (2d) 432, 448-49 (1991)). | 2 | 1993–2002 |
Battle v. Barton
green
1 sentence2002Arnold v. State, 309 S.C. 157 , 420 S.E.2d 834 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 927 , 113 S.Ct. 1302 , 122 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Lightfoot v. Town of Fairfield
green
1 sentence2002Arnold v. State, 309 S.C. 157 , 420 S.E.2d 834 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 927 , 113 S.Ct. 1302 , 122 L.Ed.2d 691 (1993). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Chapman v. California
red
1 sentence1993Secondly, [we] must weigh the probative force of the evidence against the probative force of the presumption standing alone.” Id. — S.C. at —, 420 S.E. (2d) at 839 (quoting Yates v. Evatt, 500 U.S. —, —, 111 S.Ct. 1884, 1893 , 114 L.Ed. (2d) 432, 448-49 (1991)). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Richardson v. Marsh
green
1 sentence1992Id., 500 U.S. at —, 111 S. Ct. at 1893 ,114 L. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.