Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1881–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ravenellgreen2 sentences2025See State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C. 449, 456 , 692 S.E.2d 554, 558 (Ct. App. 2010) ("In order to claim the protection afforded by the rule of law that a criminal defendant may be tried in his absence only upon a trial court's finding that the defendant has received the requisite notice of his right to be present and advisement that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to attend, a defendant or his attorney must object at the first opportunity to do so, and failure to so object constitutes waiver of the issue on appeal."); see also id. ("The deliberate absence of a defendant who know 2025See State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C. 449, 456 , 692 S.E.2d 554, 558 (Ct. App. 2010) ("In order to claim the protection afforded by the rule of law that a criminal defendant may be tried in his absence only upon a trial court's finding that the defendant has received the requisite notice of his right to be present and advisement that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to attend, a defendant or his attorney must object at the first opportunity to do so, and failure to so object constitutes waiver of the issue on appeal."); see also id. ("The deliberate absence of a defendant who know | 4 | 4 |
Ellis v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C. 449, 456 , 692 S.E.2d 554, 558 (Ct. App. 2010) ("In order to claim the protection afforded by the rule of law that a criminal defendant may be tried in his absence only upon a trial court's finding that the defendant has received the requisite notice of his right to be present and advisement that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to attend, a defendant or his attorney must object at the first opportunity to do so, and failure to so object constitutes waiver of the issue on appeal."); see also id. ("The deliberate absence of a defendant who know 2025See State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C. 449, 456 , 692 S.E.2d 554, 558 (Ct. App. 2010) ("In order to claim the protection afforded by the rule of law that a criminal defendant may be tried in his absence only upon a trial court's finding that the defendant has received the requisite notice of his right to be present and advisement that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to attend, a defendant or his attorney must object at the first opportunity to do so, and failure to so object constitutes waiver of the issue on appeal."); see also id. ("The deliberate absence of a defendant who know | 1 | 1 |
State v. Policaogreen2 sentences2020As to whether the trial court erred in allowing the trial to proceed in Fincher's absence: State v. Policao, 402 S.C. 547, 556 , 741 S.E.2d 774, 778 (Ct. App. 2013) ("The general rule of issue preservation is if an issue was not raised to and ruled upon by the [trial] court, it will not be considered for the first time on appeal." (quoting State v. Porter, 389 S.C. 27, 37 , 698 S.E.2d 237, 242 (Ct. App. 2010))); In re McCracken, 346 S.C. 87, 92 , 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) ("A constitutional claim must be raised and ruled upon to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C 2020As to whether the trial court erred in allowing the trial to proceed in Fincher's absence: State v. Policao, 402 S.C. 547, 556 , 741 S.E.2d 774, 778 (Ct. App. 2013) ("The general rule of issue preservation is if an issue was not raised to and ruled upon by the [trial] court, it will not be considered for the first time on appeal." (quoting State v. Porter, 389 S.C. 27, 37 , 698 S.E.2d 237, 242 (Ct. App. 2010))); In re McCracken, 346 S.C. 87, 92 , 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) ("A constitutional claim must be raised and ruled upon to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C | 1 | 1 |
State v. Portergreen2 sentences2020As to whether the trial court erred in allowing the trial to proceed in Fincher's absence: State v. Policao, 402 S.C. 547, 556 , 741 S.E.2d 774, 778 (Ct. App. 2013) ("The general rule of issue preservation is if an issue was not raised to and ruled upon by the [trial] court, it will not be considered for the first time on appeal." (quoting State v. Porter, 389 S.C. 27, 37 , 698 S.E.2d 237, 242 (Ct. App. 2010))); In re McCracken, 346 S.C. 87, 92 , 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) ("A constitutional claim must be raised and ruled upon to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C 2020As to whether the trial court erred in allowing the trial to proceed in Fincher's absence: State v. Policao, 402 S.C. 547, 556 , 741 S.E.2d 774, 778 (Ct. App. 2013) ("The general rule of issue preservation is if an issue was not raised to and ruled upon by the [trial] court, it will not be considered for the first time on appeal." (quoting State v. Porter, 389 S.C. 27, 37 , 698 S.E.2d 237, 242 (Ct. App. 2010))); In re McCracken, 346 S.C. 87, 92 , 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) ("A constitutional claim must be raised and ruled upon to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Care & Treatment of McCrackengreen2 sentences2020As to whether the trial court erred in allowing the trial to proceed in Fincher's absence: State v. Policao, 402 S.C. 547, 556 , 741 S.E.2d 774, 778 (Ct. App. 2013) ("The general rule of issue preservation is if an issue was not raised to and ruled upon by the [trial] court, it will not be considered for the first time on appeal." (quoting State v. Porter, 389 S.C. 27, 37 , 698 S.E.2d 237, 242 (Ct. App. 2010))); In re McCracken, 346 S.C. 87, 92 , 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) ("A constitutional claim must be raised and ruled upon to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C 2020As to whether the trial court erred in allowing the trial to proceed in Fincher's absence: State v. Policao, 402 S.C. 547, 556 , 741 S.E.2d 774, 778 (Ct. App. 2013) ("The general rule of issue preservation is if an issue was not raised to and ruled upon by the [trial] court, it will not be considered for the first time on appeal." (quoting State v. Porter, 389 S.C. 27, 37 , 698 S.E.2d 237, 242 (Ct. App. 2010))); In re McCracken, 346 S.C. 87, 92 , 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) ("A constitutional claim must be raised and ruled upon to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kennerlygreen2 sentences2020As to whether the trial court erred by denying Fincher's motion for directed verdict regarding the burglary of Metric Road because the garage was not a dwelling: State v. Kinnerly, 331 S.C. 442, 455 , 503 S.E.2d 214, 221 (Ct. App. 1998) ("In reviewing a denial of directed verdict, issues not raised to the trial court in support of the directed verdict motion are not preserved for appellate review. 2020As to whether the trial court erred by denying Fincher's motion for directed verdict regarding the burglary of Metric Road because the garage was not a dwelling: State v. Kinnerly, 331 S.C. 442, 455 , 503 S.E.2d 214, 221 (Ct. App. 1998) ("In reviewing a denial of directed verdict, issues not raised to the trial court in support of the directed verdict motion are not preserved for appellate review. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dunbargreen2 sentences2015PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142 , 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]."); State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C. 449, 456 , 692 S.E.2d 554, 558 (Ct. App. 2010) ("In order to claim the protection afforded by the rule of law that a criminal defendant may be tried in his absence only upon a trial court's finding that the defendant has received the requisite notice of his right to be present and advisement t 2015PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142 , 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]."); State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C. 449, 456 , 692 S.E.2d 554, 558 (Ct. App. 2010) ("In order to claim the protection afforded by the rule of law that a criminal defendant may be tried in his absence only upon a trial court's finding that the defendant has received the requisite notice of his right to be present and advisement t | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2010State v. Williams, 292 S.C. 231, 232 , 355 S.E.2d 861, 862 (1987). 2010State v. Williams, 292 S.C. 231, 232 , 355 S.E.2d 861, 862 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rodermund v. . Clark
green
1 sentence1881Any decisive act of that party, done with knowledge of his rights and of the fact, determines his election and makes an estoppel.” Bigelow on Estoppel 578; Rodurmond v. Clark, 46 N. Y. 354 ; Hyde v. Baldwin, 17 Pick. 303 ; Dewey v. Bell, 5 Allen (Mass.) 165; Hooper v. Hubbard, 7 Mass. 177 . | 1 | 1881–1881 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.