nalysis issue (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

nalysis issue in Tennessee

6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.green
tenn · 1999 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 8 S.W.3d 625, 628 (Tenn. 1999). 2 (...continued) probable cause. -3- A NALYSIS The defendants raise the following issues3 on appeal: • Whether the trial court erred in allowing testimony regarding statements made by Kenny Baltimore to Kathi Payne about Corder. • Whether the trial court erred in allowing the testimony of Tony Hiles. • Whether the trial court erred in allowing evidence about the purported listening device found by the plaintiffs. • Whether the jury verdict in favor of Corder’s claim of hostile work environment is contrary to the weight of the evi

11
Cockburn v. Howard Johnson, Inc.green
tenn · 1964 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011A NALYSIS Under the doctrine of prior suit pending, “where two courts have concurrent jurisdiction over a matter, the court first taking jurisdiction acquires exclusive jurisdiction over the matter, and the subsequent action must be dismissed.” Wiley v. Williams, No. E2005-02518-COA-R3-CV, 2006 WL 929264 , at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 10, 2006); see also Cockburn v. Howard Johnson, Inc., 385 S.W.2d 101, 102 (Tenn. 1964).

11
Jones v. Professional Motorcycle Escort Service, L.L.C.green
tenn · 2006 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011Jones v. Professional Motorcycle Escort Service, LLC, 193 S.W.3d 564, 567 (Tenn. 2006) (citing Conley v. State, 141 S.W.3d 591 , 594–95 (Tenn. 2004) and Leach v. Taylor, 124 S.W.3d 87, 90 (Tenn. 2004)).

11
Gleason v. Gleasongreen
tennctapp · 2004 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011Laches “is an equitable defense which requires the finder of fact to determine whether it would be inequitable or unjust to enforce the claimant’s rights.” Gleason v. Gleason, 164 S.W.3d 588, 592 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

11
Leach v. Taylorgreen
tenn · 2004 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011Jones v. Professional Motorcycle Escort Service, LLC, 193 S.W.3d 564, 567 (Tenn. 2006) (citing Conley v. State, 141 S.W.3d 591 , 594–95 (Tenn. 2004) and Leach v. Taylor, 124 S.W.3d 87, 90 (Tenn. 2004)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan green
tenn · 2008
1 sentence

2014Colonial Pipeline Company v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008).

12014–2014
Conley v. State green
tenn · 2004
1 sentence

2011Jones v. Professional Motorcycle Escort Service, LLC, 193 S.W.3d 564, 567 (Tenn. 2006) (citing Conley v. State, 141 S.W.3d 591 , 594–95 (Tenn. 2004) and Leach v. Taylor, 124 S.W.3d 87, 90 (Tenn. 2004)).

12011–2011
Judge v. State green
tenncrimapp · 1976
1 sentence

1999In addition, this Court held that the prose cutor’s reference to Petitioner as “little,” “on the prowl,” “creature,” and “comrade” were “neither so demeaning nor derogatory as to constitute an appeal to passion, prejudice, and sentiment” so as to re quire a nalysis under the test of Judge v. State, 539 S.W.2d 340 (Tenn. Crim.

11999–1999

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check