6 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1964–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ford v. Wainwrightgreen2 sentences1999Ford, 477 U.S. at 429 , 106 S.Ct. at 2612 (O’Connor, J., concurring in the result in part, dissenting in part). 1999Ford, 477 U.S. at 429 , 106 S.Ct. at 2612 (O’Connor, J., concurring in the result in part, dissenting in part). | 2 | 2 |
Preiser v. Rodriguezgreen1 sentence2008See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
Hoover, Inc. v. Metro Board of Zoning Appealsgreen1 sentence2001Stated in terms more traditionally associated with a common-law writ of certiorari, a prisoner states a claim warranting the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the record of a disciplinary proceeding if his 10 State v. Wom ack, 591 S.W .2d 437, 442 (Tenn. Ct. App . 1979). 11 Hoover v. Metrop olitan Bd. of Zoning Appea ls, 924 S.W.2d 900, 905 (Tenn. Ct. App. 199 6); Brooks v. Fisher, 705 S.W .2d 1 35, 1 36 (Ten n. | 1 | 1 |
Carroll v. Raneygreen1 sentence1999In fact, this Court recently stated in Carroll v. Raney, 953 S.W.2d 657, 659 (Tenn.1997), that the Governor’s power to grant commutations is limited only by the language in the State Constitution and may not be regulated or controlled by other branches of government. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Troutman
neutral
2 sentences1964Matter of Troutman, 24 N.J.Law, 634 ; Taintor v. Taylor, 36 Conn. 242 , 4 Am. 1964Matter of Troutman, 24 N.J.Law, 634 ; Taintor v. Taylor, 36 Conn. 242 , 4 Am. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Raine v. State
green
1 sentence1964In holding that the defendant was not denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial under the circumstances, the Court, at Page 183 of 143 Tenn., at page 194 of 226 S.W., stated: “It is finally, however, insisted by counsel for the defendant that the state, had it attempted so to do, could have secured the defendant from the federal prison and put him to trial in Tennessee on the ground that the comity existing between different sovereignties would have warranted and sanctioned this course. ¥e have been cited to no authority which even by analogy so holds, but the uniform rule with referen | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Taintor v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1964Matter of Troutman, 24 N.J.Law, 634 ; Taintor v. Taylor, 36 Conn. 242 , 4 Am. 1964Matter of Troutman, 24 N.J.Law, 634 ; Taintor v. Taylor, 36 Conn. 242 , 4 Am. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.