Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blockburger v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2015To address a multiple description claim, we must apply the two- pronged test laid out in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932). | 1 | 1 |
State of Tennessee v. Glover P. Smithgreen1 sentence2015See Smith, 436 S.W.3d at 767 ; Watkins, 362 S.W.3d at 556 . | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Eagle Bend Manufacturing, Inc.green1 sentence1999Hill v. Eagle Bend Mfg., Inc., 942 S.W.2d 483, 487 (Tenn. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Loud Hawk
green
2 sentences1997The defendant contends that this appeal was “weak from the onset,” “fruitless, nonmeritorious, tangential and therefore frivolous.” In support of his contention, the defendant points to a letter from the assistant attorney general to the prosecuting attorney requesting her to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that, in his opinion, “pm-suing an appeal on this record is futile.” The State responds that the author of the letter “did not understand the two pronged analysis for ineffective assistance of counsel claims” and rhetorically asks, “if the issue is so meritless, why did our Supreme Court 1997The defendant contends that this appeal was “weak from the onset,” “fruitless, nonmeritorious, tangential and therefore frivolous.” In support of his contention, the defendant points to a letter from the assistant attorney general to the prosecuting attorney requesting her to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that, in his opinion, “pm-suing an appeal on this record is futile.” The State responds that the author of the letter “did not understand the two pronged analysis for ineffective assistance of counsel claims” and rhetorically asks, “if the issue is so meritless, why did our Supreme Court | 2 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Watkins
green
1 sentence2015See Smith, 436 S.W.3d at 767 ; Watkins, 362 S.W.3d at 556 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Spinelli v. United States
red
1 sentence1999Recently, our sup reme cou rt observed that when applying this analysis to the area of informant’s tips, “the two- pronged test of reliability [in Jacu min] need not be as strictly applied if the inform ant’s tip is being used to establish reasonable suspicion rather than probable ca use.” State v. Simpson, 968 S.W .2d 776 , 782 (T enn. 19 98). -4- In Jacumin , the court adopted the Aguilar-Spine lli test for magistrates determining whether probable cause exists to issue a search warrant. 778 S.W.2d at 436 ; see Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S . 108 (19 64); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 ( | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Jacumin
green
1 sentence1999Recently, our sup reme cou rt observed that when applying this analysis to the area of informant’s tips, “the two- pronged test of reliability [in Jacu min] need not be as strictly applied if the inform ant’s tip is being used to establish reasonable suspicion rather than probable ca use.” State v. Simpson, 968 S.W .2d 776 , 782 (T enn. 19 98). -4- In Jacumin , the court adopted the Aguilar-Spine lli test for magistrates determining whether probable cause exists to issue a search warrant. 778 S.W.2d at 436 ; see Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S . 108 (19 64); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 ( | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Fowler v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.
green
1 sentence1993We think the trial court fully complied with the principles set in Fowler v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp., 665 S.W.2d 713 (Tenn.1984) and North American Royalties v. Thrasher, 817 S.W.2d 308 (Tenn.1991). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
North American Royalties, Inc. v. Thrasher
green
1 sentence1993We think the trial court fully complied with the principles set in Fowler v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp., 665 S.W.2d 713 (Tenn.1984) and North American Royalties v. Thrasher, 817 S.W.2d 308 (Tenn.1991). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.