6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapmangreen2 sentences2015King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman, 118 S.W.3d 742, 750 (Tex. 2003). 2015King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman, 118 S.W.3d 742, 750 (Tex. 2003). | 2 | 2 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See Thomas v. State , 621 S.W.2d 158, 163 (Tex. Crim. 2004See Thomas v. State, 621 S.W.2d 158, 163 (Tex.Crim.App.1981) (op. on reh’g). | 2 | 2 |
McIntyre v. Commission for Lawyer Disciplinegreen1 sentence2015McIntyre v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, 247 S.W.3d 434, 443 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2008, pet. denied). | 1 | 1 |
MMP, Ltd. v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2015MMP, Ltd. v. Hones, 710 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1986). 5.02 When a party moves for summary judgment on a no-evidence ground, the court reviews the claim under the same legal sufficiency standard as directed verdicts. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bioderm Skin Care, LLC and Quan Nguyen, M.D. v. Veasna \sandee\" Sok"
green
1 sentence2015Bioderm Skin Care, LLC v. Sok, 426 S.W.3d 753 (Tex. 2014). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.