Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Stone
green
2 sentences2025On appeal, this court held that a “specific instruction should not be given when a general instruction adequately explains the law, and the parties are able to argue their theories of the case within the general instruction.” Id. at 273 . 1984State v. Stone, 24 Wn. | 3 | 1983–2025 |
State v. Bradley
neutral
1 sentence1979State v. Bradley, 20 Wn. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Keyser v. Weintraub
green
2 sentences1952They are also discussed in Keyser v. Weintraub, 157 Md. 437 , 146 Atl. 275 , 65 A. L. 1952They are also discussed in Keyser v. Weintraub, 157 Md. 437 , 146 Atl. 275 , 65 A. L. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Dioguardi v. Haddow
neutral
2 sentences1952We have carefully examined them, but we think they only sustain the law as announced above, and that there is not so much question as to what the law on the subject actually is as to whether the facts surrounding *131 particular cases bring the case within the general rule or the exception.” The rules pronounced by the court in the Durand case have been followed in Dioguardi v. Haddow, 167 Wash. 62 , 8 P. (2d) 978 ; Stusser v. Gottstein, 178 Wash. 360 , 35 P. (2d) 5 ; and State Bank of Wilbur v. Phillips, 11 Wn. (2d) 483, 119 P. (2d) 664 . 1952We have carefully examined them, but we think they only sustain the law as announced above, and that there is not so much question as to what the law on the subject actually is as to whether the facts surrounding *131 particular cases bring the case within the general rule or the exception.” The rules pronounced by the court in the Durand case have been followed in Dioguardi v. Haddow, 167 Wash. 62 , 8 P. (2d) 978 ; Stusser v. Gottstein, 178 Wash. 360 , 35 P. (2d) 5 ; and State Bank of Wilbur v. Phillips, 11 Wn. (2d) 483, 119 P. (2d) 664 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Stusser v. Gottstein
neutral
2 sentences1952We have carefully examined them, but we think they only sustain the law as announced above, and that there is not so much question as to what the law on the subject actually is as to whether the facts surrounding *131 particular cases bring the case within the general rule or the exception.” The rules pronounced by the court in the Durand case have been followed in Dioguardi v. Haddow, 167 Wash. 62 , 8 P. (2d) 978 ; Stusser v. Gottstein, 178 Wash. 360 , 35 P. (2d) 5 ; and State Bank of Wilbur v. Phillips, 11 Wn. (2d) 483, 119 P. (2d) 664 . 1952We have carefully examined them, but we think they only sustain the law as announced above, and that there is not so much question as to what the law on the subject actually is as to whether the facts surrounding *131 particular cases bring the case within the general rule or the exception.” The rules pronounced by the court in the Durand case have been followed in Dioguardi v. Haddow, 167 Wash. 62 , 8 P. (2d) 978 ; Stusser v. Gottstein, 178 Wash. 360 , 35 P. (2d) 5 ; and State Bank of Wilbur v. Phillips, 11 Wn. (2d) 483, 119 P. (2d) 664 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
State Bank of Wilbur v. Phillips
green
1 sentence1952We have carefully examined them, but we think they only sustain the law as announced above, and that there is not so much question as to what the law on the subject actually is as to whether the facts surrounding *131 particular cases bring the case within the general rule or the exception.” The rules pronounced by the court in the Durand case have been followed in Dioguardi v. Haddow, 167 Wash. 62 , 8 P. (2d) 978 ; Stusser v. Gottstein, 178 Wash. 360 , 35 P. (2d) 5 ; and State Bank of Wilbur v. Phillips, 11 Wn. (2d) 483, 119 P. (2d) 664 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Carstens v. Earles
green
2 sentences1903Carstens v. Earles, 26 Wash. 676 , 67 Pac. 404 , is cited and relied upon by the appellant in support of his contention, while it is claimed by the respondent that the same case announces the law as contended for by him. 1903Carstens v. Earles, 26 Wash. 676 , 67 Pac. 404 , is cited and relied upon by the appellant in support of his contention, while it is claimed by the respondent that the same case announces the law as contended for by him. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.