Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant — emailed to you with setup instructions, and always available under that icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. William H. White, Sr., United States of America v. Lester H. Finotti, Jr.green2 sentences2005See United States v. White, 887 F.2d 267, 271 (D.C. 2005See United States v. White, 887 F.2d 267, 271 (D.C.Cir.1989) (subject to concerns of fairness and consistency, disclosure of only the topic of a confidential communication with one's attorney but not the substance does not waive the attorney-client privilege); accord Nguyen v. Excel Corp., 197 F.3d 200, 206 (5th Cir.1999). ¶ 16 Even if Barbee had waived the confidential communications privilege, the firm would still have to show a waiver of the broader testimonial privilege. | 2 | 2 |
Tsai-Son Nguyen v. Excel Corp.green1 sentence2005See United States v. White, 887 F.2d 267, 271 (D.C.Cir.1989) (subject to concerns of fairness and consistency, disclosure of only the topic of a confidential communication with one's attorney but not the substance does not waive the attorney-client privilege); accord Nguyen v. Excel Corp., 197 F.3d 200, 206 (5th Cir.1999). ¶ 16 Even if Barbee had waived the confidential communications privilege, the firm would still have to show a waiver of the broader testimonial privilege. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hamilton, Superintendent v. Verdow
green
2 sentences2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . 2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
United States v. Nixon
green
2 sentences2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . 2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 710-11 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Nero v. Hyland
green
2 sentences2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . 2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Guy v. Judicial Nominating Commission
green
2 sentences2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . 2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
State ex rel. Dann v. Taft
green
2 sentences2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . 2013Nixon, 418 U.S. at 705-08 ; Republican Party, 283 P.3d at 866-68; Dann, 848 N.E.2d at 484 ; Guy, 659 A.2d at 783-84 ; Hamilton, 414 A.2d at 922 ; Nero, 386 A.2d at 853 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Thornton
green
1 sentence2019State v. Thornton, 119 29 No. 34898-9-III State v. Hawkins Wn.2d 578, 580, 835 P.2d 216 (1992). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Grasser
green
2 sentences1992Thorne, 43 Wn.2d at 56 . 4 See State v. Grasser, 60 Wn.2d 343, 346-47 , 374 P.2d 149 (1962) (Finley, C.J., dissenting). 5 RCW 9A.48.080C1) provides: "A person is guilty of malicious mischief in the second degree if he knowingly and maliciously: "(a) Causes physical damage to the property of another in an amount exceeding two hundred fifty dollars". 6 RCW 9A.56.020 states in pertinent part: "(1) 'Theft' means: "(a) To wrongfully obtain or exert unauthorized control over the property or services of another or the value thereof, with intent to deprive him of such property or services; . . .". 1992Thorne, 43 Wn.2d at 56 . 4 See State v. Grasser, 60 Wn.2d 343, 346-47 , 374 P.2d 149 (1962) (Finley, C.J., dissenting). 5 RCW 9A.48.080C1) provides: "A person is guilty of malicious mischief in the second degree if he knowingly and maliciously: "(a) Causes physical damage to the property of another in an amount exceeding two hundred fifty dollars". 6 RCW 9A.56.020 states in pertinent part: "(1) 'Theft' means: "(a) To wrongfully obtain or exert unauthorized control over the property or services of another or the value thereof, with intent to deprive him of such property or services; . . .". | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Thorne
green
2 sentences1992RCW 5.60.060(1); State v. Thorne, 43 Wn.2d 47, 55 , 260 P.2d 331 (1953). 3 The communications privilege survives dissolution and death. 1992RCW 5.60.060(1); State v. Thorne, 43 Wn.2d 47, 55 , 260 P.2d 331 (1953). 3 The communications privilege survives dissolution and death. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.