Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Bellevue v. Hellenthalgreen2 sentences2003Accord City of Bellevue v. Hellenthal, 144 Wash.2d 425, 431 , 28 P.3d 744 (2001) (holding IRLJ 6.6, which allows a certificate in "` substantially `... the form " articulated in the rule to be used in lieu of an expert witness in a contested traffic hearing, is satisfied so long as the "substance of the rule's requirements are contained in the form used." (emphasis added)). 2003Accord City of Bellevue v. Hellenthal, 144 Wn.2d 425, 431 , 28 P.3d 744 (2001) (holding IRLJ 6.6, which allows a certificate in “ ‘substantially’. . . the form” articulated in the rule to be used in lieu of an expert witness in a contested traffic hearing, is satisfied so long as the “substance of the rule’s requirements are contained in the form used.” (emphasis added)). | 2 | 4 |
City of Bellevue v. Hellenthalgreen2 sentences2003Accord City of Bellevue v. Hellenthal, 144 Wash.2d 425, 431 , 28 P.3d 744 (2001) (holding IRLJ 6.6, which allows a certificate in "` substantially `... the form " articulated in the rule to be used in lieu of an expert witness in a contested traffic hearing, is satisfied so long as the "substance of the rule's requirements are contained in the form used." (emphasis added)). 2003Accord City of Bellevue v. Hellenthal, 144 Wn.2d 425, 431 , 28 P.3d 744 (2001) (holding IRLJ 6.6, which allows a certificate in “ ‘substantially’. . . the form” articulated in the rule to be used in lieu of an expert witness in a contested traffic hearing, is satisfied so long as the “substance of the rule’s requirements are contained in the form used.” (emphasis added)). | 2 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Murchison.
green
2 sentences2001The United States Supreme Court has recognized that “to perform its high function in the best way ‘justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.’ ” In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S. Ct. 623 , 99 L. 2001The United States Supreme Court has recognized that “to perform its high function in the best way ‘justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.’ ” In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S. Ct. 623 , 99 L. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Offutt v. United States
green
2 sentences2001The United States Supreme Court has recognized that "to perform its high function in the best way `justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.' " In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S.Ct. 623 , 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955) (quoting Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 , 75 S.Ct. 11 , 99 L.Ed. 11 (1954)). 2001The United States Supreme Court has recognized that "to perform its high function in the best way `justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.' " In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 , 75 S.Ct. 623 , 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955) (quoting Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 , 75 S.Ct. 11 , 99 L.Ed. 11 (1954)). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.