Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Telford v. Thurston County Board of Commissionersgreen2 sentences2026See 95 Wn. 2006Telford, 95 Wn. | 1 | 3 |
Worthington v. WestNETgreen2 sentences2016See Worthington v. WestNET, 182 Wn.2d 500, 508 , 341 P.3d 995 (2015) (stating that the Telford factors, though instructive, had limited applicability in determining whether a multijurisdictional drug task force was subject to the PRA). 4 The functional equivalent test is derived from federal jurisprudence. 2016See Worthington v. WestNET, 182 Wn.2d 500, 508 , 341 P.3d 995 (2015) (stating that the Telford factors, though instructive, had limited applicability in determining whether a multijurisdictional drug task force was subject to the PRA). 4 The functional equivalent test is derived from federal jurisprudence. | 1 | 1 |
James Rocap v. Victor H. Indiek and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporationgreen1 sentence1999Cir. 1981); Rocap v. Indiek, 539 F.2d 174, 180-81 (D.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Swanson
green
2 sentences2012The court in State v. Swanson, 112 Haw. 343, 354 , 145 P.3d 886 (2006) similarly concluded that responses to jury communications are the functional equivalent of an instruction and the defendant’s right to a public trial was not implicated when the jury sent the court a number of communications after business hours when the court was closed and locked (normal security caused the building to be closed). 2012The court in State v. Swanson, 112 Haw. 343, 354 , 145 P.3d 886 (2006) similarly concluded that responses to jury communications are the functional equivalent of an instruction and the defendant’s right to a public trial was not implicated when the jury sent the court a number of communications after business hours when the court was closed and locked (normal security caused the building to be closed). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
cluster 398778
green
1 sentence1999Federal courts developed the functional equivalent test to determine whether entities were subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). 16 See Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Department of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 668 F.2d 537 , 543-44 (D.C. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.